To: Senator Kunte Klinte
I suppose it's OK as long as the schools are separate but equal. It all depends on who has the power to manipulate public opinion since principle doesn't seem to matter.
2 posted on
08/24/2004 3:13:06 PM PDT by
OESY
To: OESY
"I suppose it's OK as long as the schools are separate but equal."
I could almost swear I have heard that term before, nah, couldn't be.
11 posted on
08/24/2004 4:01:43 PM PDT by
RipSawyer
("Embed" Michael Moore with the 82nd airborne.)
To: OESY
Some women's groups and the American Civil Liberties Union say segregation of any kind is wrong. "We think segregation has historically always resulted in second-class citizens," said Terry O'Neill, a National Organization for Women vice president. . . . "Many school districts wanted to offer this option, but they feared being sued by interest groups" So much for feminists and the ACLU being on the side of choice and freedom.
To: OESY
Some women's groups and the American Civil Liberties Union say segregation of any kind is wrong. "We think segregation has historically always resulted in second-class citizens," said Terry O'Neill, a National Organization for Women vice president. . . . "Many school districts wanted to offer this option, but they feared being sued by interest groups" So much for feminists and the ACLU being on the side of choice and freedom.
To: OESY
Choice is the deciding factor. Make it possible for any child to attend a single sex school if they want. I do think a better education for girls and boys would occur. Add uniforms and dropping sports as a competitive activity (exercise, yes) time and money spent inside the school system for sports, no (let those who want to, join community sports clubs).
31 posted on
08/25/2004 11:21:23 AM PDT by
WHATNEXT?
(That's PRESIDENT BUSH (not Mr.)!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson