To: texasflower
Without all the facts!!!!!!!! My, my, my. It appears you are being just a bit hypocritical then, in the way you are treating others who have reached that conclusion of this event. Uh, no not at all. Think about it for a second. The first plane on Sept. 11th could easily have been an accident. Planes have hit buildings in the past so it was not unheard of. However when a second plane come flying in at close to 600 mph and slams into one of the towers, it is not going to be an accident and a terrorist attack is the only possibility.
393 posted on
08/24/2004 4:14:32 PM PDT by
COEXERJ145
(I Annoy Buchananites)
To: COEXERJ145
However when a second plane come flying in at close to 600 mph and slams into one of the towers, it is not going to be an accident and a terrorist attack is the only possibility. Not if, for example, a mad scientist was trying out a new giant high-powered magnet... There's ALWAYS other possibilities. SOme, however, are not realistic ones... that's all I'm sayin'
405 posted on
08/24/2004 4:16:24 PM PDT by
Chad Fairbanks
(I think the mistake a lot of us make is thinking the state-appointed shrink is our friend.)
To: COEXERJ145
Why don't you give this up? What do you hope to gain by staying so combative?
Since the beginning of this thread you have been arguing with someone. We get it. You know something about aviation.
That's very nice for you. But you just might be wrong this time.
414 posted on
08/24/2004 4:19:32 PM PDT by
texasflower
(in the event of the Rapture, the Bush White House will be unmanned.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson