Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Stultis
It's very simple.

If Mr. French said in the affidavit that he personally witnessed events that he did not actually witness, he can be disbarred and probably removed from office.

If Mr. French made clear in the affidavit that he was relaying information from third parties, then there is no reason for anyone to complain.

The fact that they are protesting rather than taking legal action tells me that the latter scenario is factual one.

Also, someone should research the names of these "veterans" and see whether and where they actually served.

5 posted on 08/24/2004 11:59:15 AM PDT by wideawake (God bless our brave soldiers and their Commander in Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: wideawake
If Mr. French made clear in the affidavit that he was relaying information from third parties, then there is no reason for anyone to complain.

Hearsay is never admissible in court testimony or affadavits. It's fundamental to our legal system. Every attorney knows it.
32 posted on 08/24/2004 12:42:33 PM PDT by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: wideawake
"relaying information from third parties"

Why can damn lawyers attest to hearsay and I can't??

52 posted on 08/24/2004 1:25:06 PM PDT by litehaus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson