[mlstier]

Actually, ABC radio is reading an Associated Press story, that starts out calling the Swift Vets as "Republican funded". (It's that way on the abcnews.com website; with an 'api' tagline.)

However, reading the story, the bias of the writer is obvious. I doubt he ever refers to MoveOn.org stories as "Democrat funded".

[OldFriend]

Actually, the entire DNC is Soros funded! Not the other way around!

[TNCMAXQ]

>ABC radio is reading an Associated Press story, that >starts out calling the Swift Vets as "Republican funded".

>However, reading the story, the bias of the writer is >obvious. I doubt he ever refers to MoveOn.org stories >as "Democrat funded"

Exactly right! Just like 16 years ago they referred to the Willie Horton ads as "Bush campaign ads" though they were done by Floyd Brown's group. Media bias has only gotten worse since then. Back then they were slanted. Now they are complete flunkies for the Dems.

And in reply to the person who said most of the SBVTs are Republicans, I don't know that this is necessarily the case. O'Neill and others have stated they are not registered Republicans. O'Neill did not even vote for GWB the last time.