Posted on 08/23/2004 10:34:52 AM PDT by CFW
The landlords need to worry as much as the scavengers do. Actually, the landlord is a more easily identified target - the tenant might not have any idea who took his stuff.
Well remember, once someone has been evicted, they likely haven't paid rent in months. All the while the landlord has to keep paying the note on the home/apartment, whatever. At that point you are a deadbeat and ought to be thrown out. Well before eviction the landlord (in every state) has to have 'asked nicely' that you leave voluntarily. The eviction is the final act by the landlord to force you out because you won't go on your own. So respect from the landlord as a 'client' isn't really due.
I don't support the idea that the landlord should be liable for the property theft (and in fact he would not be if the eviction procedures were followed propertly). It is the scumbag thief neighbors who should be strung up - along with the cop who condoned their activity. Whether or not what he did was illegal, he should be a cop because he is lacking the moral character we should expect of cops.
I do think the eviction laws need to be loosened some. I mean - there should be adequate protection for tenants, but it shouldn't take months to force someone out.
I'm getting married next year & we're going to keep my fiancee's house to rent out. We've already decided we will rent only to (a) women / college gals who (b) go to our [huge] church. There is no shortage of good, honest college girls at our church. We're not renting to college guys, people with kids, or questionable single people. Fair housing laws be damned - it's our house and we'll do as we please.
Oh, I agree. In my apartment days (just a couple years ago) I had some landlords (apartment managers, actually) that acted like everyone was either a deadbeat or would likely become one. Probably a product of their experience - they do have to deal with alot of excuses, etc...
I think that deals with when the tenant moves out and apparantly 'abandons' property.
Remember that when a tenant breaks a lease, the landlord can hold him responsible for the remainder of it. So it only stands to reason that the landlord should take reasonable care to protect the tenant't property until the lease is over. That is, the landlord can't have it both ways - throw the stuff away but still hold the tenant responsible for the lease.
Renting an apartment is a business. People live off it, just like people live off driving a bus or selling cars.
You can work your tail off trying to get a nice person, but it is very largely a question of chance the character your tenant has. I treat my tenants like gold. In return, I expect some basic respect for my property and the rent paid on time.
We have had tenants glue up the drains, burn down property, and attack family members - all whom were treated very nicely - but there are a lot of nuts out there. And of course there are the professional scammers, especially in places like NY.
You can't afford to be a bleeding heart. Just a nice decent person trying to make a living is fine. The tenants have to hold up their end of the bargain too.
actually there is case law to back up her case.
I expect the law varies depending upon what part of the country you live in.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.