Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Texas_Dawg
So because he's not in favor of further liberalizing our immigration laws, he's "strongly opposed" to immigration? That's some pretty bizarre logic. Likewise, people who favor keeping government within its constitutional bounds must be "strongly opposed" to government.
138 posted on 08/23/2004 5:28:37 PM PDT by inquest (Judges are given the power to decide cases, not to decide law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies ]


To: inquest
So because he's not in favor of further liberalizing our immigration laws, he's "strongly opposed" to immigration? Well... he's opposed to it enough to want to create massive federal government programs and spend billions of dollars on those programs in order to stop immigration from Mexico. Yeah, I'd say he's "strongly opposed" to it.
139 posted on 08/23/2004 5:39:30 PM PDT by Texas_Dawg (Pat Buchanan and Kim Jong-Il agree... "Anyone But Bush".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson