My life is not that much different under George Bush than it was Bill Clinton. Although I believe Bush to be a well-intentioned and far more moral man than Bill Clinton, there is still abortion on demand, my taxes are still way too high, I still don't trust any government to educate my children and we have a budget out of control.
I don't defend everything Buchanan says or does but people who defend everything Republican are those who will end up with guys like Arnold Schwarzenegger in office - and deservedly so.
Oh yes, now I remember, when Buchanan was campaigning in Iowa against Keyes and Bauer he promised that if he got elected, he would outlaw all abortions the day he was inaugurated.
Amazingly, there were some people who actually believed a president could do that. You must be one of them.
Do you truly wish to live in a country where there are radical changes with every Presidential election?
If so, I would suggest Venezuela, or maybe Peru, because that's not what this country is all about.
Change must come about in an orderly, steadfast fashion, and to hold on to the idea that each change in the Presidency could impact our society to the extent that you wish to see it change, is equivalent to desiring a dictatorship.
The idea is to achieve the changes you wish to see happen, in an orderly fashion, with long-term plans.
The fact that your life, and mine for that matter, is truly not so very different under George W. Bush as it was under Bill Clinton, is not an indication of similar styles or ideologies shared between the two Presidents, but rather a testament to the genius of the Founders, and the system of government they created.