[CWOJackson]

Simply because a publisher puts something into print doesn't mean it's worth reading. As for buchanan, there's zero reason to believe there is anything new in this latest drivel...and from his interview regarding the book that seems very much the case.

Granted, a dust cover from his book makes an excellent urinal liner/target, but the pages are far more expensive then real toilet paper and not nearly as functional.

[billbears]

the massive and growing deficit, the disintegration of the culture and a Wilsonian foreign policy that means war ad infinitum

I don't like Buchanan, especially some of his trade policy stances, but this statement from him is true. It's an issue and it needs to be dealt with. Buchanan won't probably have the answers that would deal with these issues, as he is too ready to point out the problem without a viable answer, but I can't say either of the major two candidates have one. They're both seemingly too busy in making more unconstitutional promises to get votes.

I just found it telling that instead of discussing some of the points discussed in the article by the third post it devolves into fourth grade namecalling. How exactly is that constructive?