Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New book criticizes President (Buchanan again!)
Fort Worth Star- Telegram ^ | 8/23/2004 | David Kirkpatrick

Posted on 08/22/2004 10:29:33 AM PDT by sinkspur

Patrick Buchanan, the conservative commentator whose Republican primary challenge and divisive convention speech weakened the first President Bush's campaign for re-election in 1992, is publishing a book excoriating the second President Bush over the invasion of Iraq, just in time to grab a share of the limelight at another Republican convention.

In Where the Right Went Wrong, released late last week, Buchanan calls the invasion of Iraq "the greatest strategic blunder in 40 years, a mistake more costly than Vietnam. If prudence is the mark of a conservative, Mr. Bush has ceased to be a conservative," Buchanan wrote. The release of the book, which coincides with the Republican National Convention, gives Buchanan occasion to lay out his case on television and in book promotions just as the Bush campaign seeks to project an image of unity, reviving unhappy memories of the disruptive role Buchanan has played in the past.

"He has a following in conservative circles," said Paul Weyrich, a veteran conservative organizer. "It is not what it once was just because the religious right is not particularly enamored with him. But it is going to have an effect. In a very close election, criticism from anybody who is credible is going to have an effect."

In an interview, however, Buchanan said publishing a book during the campaign was the best way he knew to inject what he considers important ideas into the debate. "The reason I wanted it out now is, it addresses big issues that are not being addressed in this campaign: the massive and growing deficit, the disintegration of the culture and a Wilsonian foreign policy that means war ad infinitum," he said.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: antiwarright; bookreview; buchanan; haircutboysbuddy; irrelevant; patbuchanan; patthebackstabber; rightwentwrong; spoilsport; usefulidiot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 321-336 next last
To: harrycarey

Have you noticed how MindFried there, who claims to be a staunch conservative, is so clueless about buchanan that any conservative would know?


121 posted on 08/22/2004 12:50:45 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
At least Buchanan makes a lip service attempt at justifying his conclusions on Constitutional principle.

yes, buchanan is good at paying the Consitution lip service in pursuit of his vendetta and efforts to enrich himself. I'm sure you find that noble indeed.

Let's just say I find it a bit more noble than being a yes man for a 'two party system' gone mad. We need ~more~ dissent in America jackson, not less.

122 posted on 08/22/2004 12:52:23 PM PDT by tpaine (No man has a natural right to commit aggression on the equal rights of another. - T. Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
"Let's just say I find it a bit more noble than ..."

Of course your would find someone who wraps their greed and vindictiveness in the Constitution noble.

123 posted on 08/22/2004 12:54:05 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

The Sunday Seattle Times ran this story also. Pat is a dork. If a Republican is not lock step with him, then he is open game for attacks from Pat.


124 posted on 08/22/2004 12:55:14 PM PDT by NavyCanDo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MindFire
Then you are misinformed.
125 posted on 08/22/2004 12:55:31 PM PDT by Luis Gonzalez (Sin Patria, pero sin amo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez

Not misinformed my friend...he's been living in a cave. If you look at his latest statements, he had no clue who pat buchanan was before today. Yet he claims to be a staunch conservative forced to vote third party for Kerry...and I'm the King of Norway.


126 posted on 08/22/2004 12:57:29 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson

...and I am Batman.


127 posted on 08/22/2004 12:58:43 PM PDT by Luis Gonzalez (Sin Patria, pero sin amo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: NavyCanDo

And I'm sure that the Seattle Times made sure to call buchanan a conservative (I stopped the Times several years ago).


128 posted on 08/22/2004 12:59:00 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez

Make that Sir Batman...I've just knighted you with my kipper.


129 posted on 08/22/2004 12:59:46 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
LOL!! It contributed to Bush's loss, whether you recognize it or not.

Bush was responsible for Bush's loss.

130 posted on 08/22/2004 1:02:06 PM PDT by Penner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Penner

Well, you'll notice no other Republican has asked Buchanan to speak for them. That speech was his farewell to the GOP.


131 posted on 08/22/2004 1:03:53 PM PDT by sinkspur ("What's the point in being Pope if I can't wear the tiara?"--Cardinal Fanfani)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: MindFire

So guy, would you like to explain to everyone how it is a stanch conservative such as yourself, who is being forced to vote their conservative values in a third party vote for Kerry, had never heard of buchanan or his antics until today?


132 posted on 08/22/2004 1:05:16 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson

"Could we have kippers for breakfast..."


133 posted on 08/22/2004 1:05:33 PM PDT by Luis Gonzalez (Sin Patria, pero sin amo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
-- yes, buchanan is good at paying the Consitution lip service in pursuit of his vendetta and efforts to enrich himself.
I'm sure you find that noble indeed.

Let's just say I find it a bit more noble than being a yes man for a 'two party system' gone mad.
We need ~more~ dissent in America jackson, not less.

Of course your would find someone who wraps their greed and vindictiveness in the Constitution noble.

I find neither you nor Pat are "noble", jackson, fer sure.

But he does honor [with lip service at least] his oath to our Constitution, a bit more than you seem to do..

134 posted on 08/22/2004 1:06:05 PM PDT by tpaine (No man has a natural right to commit aggression on the equal rights of another. - T. Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: 0siris; Southack
This is serious, serious stuff. A man who, in his late 40s early 50s, valorizes the Nazi troops? Calls Hitler a "soldier's soldier?" Entertains Holocaust denial fantasies? Gripes about the Revolution of "Women's Rights" that needs to happen in the Islamic world? It is the stuff that the Left throws in the face of the GOP, conservatives, free marketeers all the time. Pat Buchanan is a conservative only a Leftist could love, because he validates all the KKK stereotypes that the Left has of capitalists and Christians. He does nothing but damage to the Right, and probably cost Bush I the election w/ his tone deaf "Cultural War" speech. He fights the Cultural War the stupidest and most counterproductive way imaginable, w/ repugnant bombastity and pedantic appeals to life in the 1950s, instead of an affirmation of positive values and the use of logic and reason. He is the epitome of a Pyrrhic victory, someone who may embolden the base only to alienate the majority.

Outstanding!


$710.96... The price of freedom
VII-XXIII-MMIV

135 posted on 08/22/2004 1:10:13 PM PDT by rdb3 ("The Republican Party is the ship and all else is the sea." ---Frederick Douglass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez; CWOJackson

Sorry to butt-in, "but" I have been the Queen of England for some time now, and I am wondering whether Pattsie Buchanan have to tout his latest tome on PMSNBC during the convention or if he's been booked on the other anti-Bush-agenda-driven news shows as well?


136 posted on 08/22/2004 1:10:19 PM PDT by onyx (JohnKerry -- the standard bearer for the unbearable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
"I find neither you nor Pat are "noble", jackson, fer sure."

You're starting to do the Kerry two-step...and after your valiant defense of buchanan.

137 posted on 08/22/2004 1:10:32 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
Buchanan said publishing a book during the campaign was the best way he knew to inject what he considers important ideas into the debate. "The reason I wanted it out now is, it addresses big issues that are not being addressed in this campaign: the massive and growing deficit, the disintegration of the culture and a Wilsonian foreign policy that means war ad infinitum," he said.

From all the 'intelligently' formed responses here, it seems many have had a chance to read Pat's book and make an informed decision.... Can't say I agree with Pat on everything but he makes a point and one that needs to be heard.

138 posted on 08/22/2004 1:12:24 PM PDT by billbears (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: onyx
"Sorry to butt-in, "but" I have been the Queen of England for some time now..."

Lady Elton John? Is that you? Wow!

I'm sure every left wing venue possible will be touting buchanan as a "true" conservative and qouting his book. Maybe he and Michael Moore could go on tour together.

139 posted on 08/22/2004 1:13:04 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Penner
Bush's concession to the Democrats in Congress, raising taxes in trade for their passing other needed budget-balancing legislation, completed the Reagan economic vision. Meanwhile, the shortsightedness of the hard right, and their absolute lack of understanding of economics, paid him back by helping elect Bill Clinton, thus handing the bragging rights of Reagan's and Bush I's pay off for their hard work, A.K.A. the 90's economic boom, and control of the White House for eight years to the Democrats.

READ MY LIPS: IDIOTS, EVERY ONE OF THEM WHO VOTED FOR PEROT.

140 posted on 08/22/2004 1:13:40 PM PDT by Luis Gonzalez (Sin Patria, pero sin amo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 321-336 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson