Can't get over how these secular skeptics only know strawman arguments from the creo sites.
"Unfortunately, his posts can be cherry-picked by DU (inter alia) to show that Conservatives are illiterate. From his responses, I'm assuming this is the result he wants."
"illiterate" would imply i can neither read, nor write. yet i do both.
it would also imply i am ignorant of the language i am speaking. given that i know its function and how the brain actually interprets the symbols, and i use this in my writings, i would say that makes me literate in the same sense as Theodor Seuss Geisel. the man didnt adhear to formal writing, and it created one of the most ingenious ways of communicating to children ideas like "greed" and "peer pressure" and even making life an adventure.
if a DUmmy wants to pass judgement on me, go right ahead. i dont value their logic, and after talking to most of them, i realize they will never value all of mine. i find most of them to be quite ignorant. any thing they say about me would be like a football player telling a doctor how to reset his joint. if you care what a DUmmy thinks, that just shows me how secure you are in your social view.
and as for people on Freep. if they like me, they like me. if they dont, fine. if they base any assumptions of me only on my style, i say they dont know what they are missing.
again, i dont give a flying rat's posterior.