Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sal

Not evil. Stupid. Childishly naive. He probably kneels by his bed every night to say his prayers.

He would have rejected the Nobel prize if he'd had an ounce of maturity and/or integrity. His historical reputation will be blemished by it.


12 posted on 08/21/2004 6:46:51 AM PDT by zebra 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: zebra 2

He lobbied 20 years for the Peace Prize. Now he's running for sainthood. I sure hope he gets it.


13 posted on 08/21/2004 7:07:33 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: zebra 2
I respectfully disagree. Childish naivete only covers so much--like the Clintons' various treasons hiding behind "another bureaucratic SNAFU".

Here's how I look at it. When you're playing tennis with friends, you get some bad calls because people make mistakes. If some of the mistakes are in their favor and some in your favor, they're really just mistakes. If it's all in their favor, they're cheating.

In looking back on both Carter's and the Clintons' "achievements", I don't see much--if anything--that was helpful to our country. I see plenty that damaged our country. When it's all one way all the time, it's NOT accidental, coincidental, or innocent. IMO.

14 posted on 08/21/2004 7:23:17 AM PDT by Sal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson