Posted on 08/20/2004 2:08:48 PM PDT by johnny7
WASHINGTON - Can Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry prove his allegation that the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth, a group airing ads denigrating his service as a Navy officer in Vietnam, are nothing more than "a front for the Bush campaign"? In one sense, that may be an immaterial question if voters decide that the group is part of an overall anti-Kerry strategy that is approved or assented to by President Bush or his campaign aides.
(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...
Ain't gonna happen. He can't afford to have those records out for the public. Not enough have seen his new and improved citations and you know he was sweating over that hitting the front page. He'll rant and rave and whine and spray his hair, but Hillary only wants to take this far enough to make Bush look bad but not lose.
From http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Printable.asp?ID=13584
...a search on the Democratic National Committee Website for the words "MoveOn.org" produces a few paragraphs that raise instant questions for Soros.
One item says, "The DNC is also conducting a major petition drive in partnership with MoveOn.org. More than 310,000 Americans have signed the petition to protect our courts - with more than 172,000 of those signatures coming in the past 36 hours. The petition calls on Bush and the Republicans to stop nominating judges that are out of step with mainstream Americans and praising the Democrats for standing up for their rights." The DNC website links the petition.
The other announcement involved what the DNC called "a massive public mobilization" in which "The Democratic Party is partnering with MoveOn.org..." to fight President Bushs tax cuts.
2 posted on 08/20/2004 5:42:04 PM EDT by lonewacko_dot_com (http://lonewacko.com/blog)
I'm surprised he didn't say it reminded him of Vietnam like he did the river when he was in Louisiana.
It means absolutely nothing. Also, I noticed the dork had his sleeves unbuttoned and flopping. The elderly people he was with were looking around and semed tired and not in the mood to be told their hardships were *inspirational* to this drop-in in a fresh, pressed, long-sleeved shirt. It is 90 and humid, there.
IIRC, W was listening to people and nodding and getting them some help, not using the disaster to talk about himself. F'n could have jetted to DC and gotten Edwards to co-sponsor some sort of huge relief bill. He could have jawboned the rest of Senate to join them in this sort of response. But, noooooooooooooooo......
Yes, dogs. I rarely wear underwear. And when I do it is usually something unusual.
The swift vet poll is losing big time.
I believe Dave Barry referred to the theme of the Democrat convention as "Becoming strong through strength and strengthening through strongness" or some such thing. It was very funny.
August 10, 2004
Left-wing "hate Bush" groups just recently proudly announced they have raised some $75 million to run attack ads against President Bush in battleground states.
A good chunk of these funds are from Democratic gazillionaires like George Soros. The hypocrisy of the left on campaign financing is truly stunning. For years, those on the left were cheerleaders for legislation like McCain-Feingold that would take "big money" out of politics. The were sick of multimillionaire donors "buying elections."
Well, excuse me, but what in the world do they think George Soros is doing? Mr. Soros, who has labeled George Bush "the most dangerous man in the world," has already given $16 million to "hate Bush" groups and he has said he will consider giving much more if that money can be used to defeat Bush-Cheney in November. But the left-wing campaign finance zealots have not issued a peep of protest.
The American Prospect magazine for years railed against big donor politics but recently applauded the Soros money because it will "level the playing field with Bush." But Mr. Bush raises his money $2,000 at a time, not $2 million at a time.
If the left doesn't want to play by the rules it set up with the new campaign law, that's fine. Let's repeal this misbegotten law by all means.
Simple. That's when dahair falls off dadog.
It's not just online polls - all polls are skewed. Think about who runs polling firms - and utilizes them to shape public policy.
It's a scandal of highest proportion, the bogus polls are bought and paid for, and then cited at a later date as gospel in order to further "progressive" issues. In this way, the sheeple have their basic core values transformed. Those not easily swayed by propaganda are then shut out, frozen, or isolated as holding "minority" opinions.
In the political realm, polling can sway voters to not vote at all, or change their vote, even. Polling data is closely held, proprietary, and organizations that poll won't even tell you who they are, etc.
"Well, don't look for a copy at the Barnes & Noble in far west Houston. They don't carry it."
I just went on break and found it at Auntie's Bookstore in Spokane, Washington.
TMI
For all who need to see the ad, email the ad, etc:
http://humaneventsonline.com.edgesuite.net/unfit_video2.html
Not sure how this is going to shake out, but the "cat's outta the bag" at least, FINALLY the citizenry can see the wholesale, multi-gazillion dollar frontal assaults on normal, everyday people of all walks of life that has only accelerated in the last 30 years. It's ridiculous. Thousands of good people were drafted - did their duty - and have since been ridiculed by the usual suspects for 40 years. See "Stolen Valor" another must read in the line on the shameful communist propaganda thrown on our veterans returning from the war, regardless of how you might personally feel about wars in SE Asia.
This S&^% has got to stop, the leftists shell game is about played out anyway, and all thanks to brave men and women today who are willing to stand up and call it like they see it. Pretty tough to stop folks who CAN'T BE BOUGHT.
The big media conglomerates no longer control the terms of the debate - and since the Democrat party hasn't been democratic for some time, of course they aren't liking this AT ALL. I always knew, somehow, their waxing eloquent about "free speech" and "tolerance" was a load of crap. They are authoritarian bastards to the core.
Bravo to the Vietnam veterans who, democrat or republican, who only want the TRUTH to come out about this. Jefferson would be proud, at least, for that.
Makes me almost barf.
His father was CIA director at the time, and can one imagine what could have happened if W had ended up in enemy hands?
"Can Kerry make a case that Bush broke the law?"
Can Bush make a case that Kerry isn't above the law?????????
MoveOn Operative Joins Kerry Campaign Amid FEC Investigation
By Jimmy Moore
Talon News
April 8, 2004
http://www.talonnews.com/news/2004/april/0408_moveon_exley_kerryp.shtml
LOL--Speaking of the 'Silk Pony,' he's been unusually quiet during all this--do you think the cult of pagan jackasses could be plotting a Lautenberg-style switcharoo in the event Heinz-Kerry short-circuits from the pressure?
Not to mention that Kerry people have worked for MoveOn et al, and vice versa. Zack Exley, who was being the Bush in 30 seconds ad campaign where the Bush is Hitler ad ran, now works for Kerry. Did we hear a peep out of the media about this?
ping.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.