Posted on 08/20/2004 10:31:43 AM PDT by areafiftyone
This ... from the people that brought you F911
Typical Dems scrambling to throw as much feces in the air so they can confuse the issue as much as possible.
Well that explains why Barnes and Nobles has it on hold! I can't believe Barnes and Nobles is being stopped from selling a book by Media Matters!!! BWAAAHAAAAAAAAAAAAA What idiots they are. Amazon is selling it and so are alot of other places!
I just ordered from buybooks.com - they're saying 1-2 weeks at the moment.
Was there a disclaimer at the beginning of F911? Was the a warning when purchasing The Clinton's books? I think not.
Translation: Left Wing PAC
Is it me or is the media and the left completely ignoring the fact that Thurlow is disputing the REPORT THAT LEAD TO THE MEDALS?
This is amazing! Since when have retailers given a rat's hind end about the "truthfulness" of books? If there is an issue here, it will be decided in the courts, not the checkout counters.
Scared? Man, I guess so.
David Brock... conservative until Hillary seduced him to join the Dark Side Of The Force.
Do you think this policy ought to apply to such works of fiction as Against All Enemies (by Richard Clarke), The Politics of Truth (by Joe Wilson), and My Life (by Bill Clinton).
The left shows its dirty face, and its real agenda of censorship, intolerance, and eventually destruction of all those who dare oppose them.
Let me tell you something about Barnes & Nobles. When some hackers defaced the "UNFIT FOR COMMAND" book and replaced the title with "FIT FOR COMMAND", I contacted Barnes & Nobles to complain. They sent me an e-mail saying that they weren't hacked and that it was a glitch in their system. Barnes & Nobles are the biggest dam liars on the face of the earth!
Does anyone know who funds these people? or how to find out who funds them?
Maybe Mel Gibson can get a film version of Unfit For Command out to the indie theatres before election day. That would frost Hollywood over worse than the "Day After".
Yeah, that name caught my attention, too.
What a smarmy little creep. Ecch!
David Brock, the sodomite.
Exactly -which- allegation is false?
Liar liar - Brock's on Fire. The former brat prince of the right wing tells us, once again, that he lied, once again. And 10 years later, the whole sad cadaver of the Clarence Thomas - Anita Hill story is resurrected.
David Brock, in his earnest mea culpa, now says that while he piled all that dirt on Anita Hill, he didn't even try to dig for the real story. He did it, he says, in the name of conservatism. He did it, he admits, in the name of his career.
LIBERAL ORGANIZATION ALERT!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.