Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

RUSH will have Michelle Malkin ON LIVE 1PM EDT
Rush show ^ | 08/20/04 | Self

Posted on 08/20/2004 9:12:38 AM PDT by GRRRRR

Rush JUST announced that today, 1PM Eastern, he will have Michelle Malkin on LIVE.

Obligatory Picture..

MONDAY--He will have John O'Neil on LIVE ALSO!!

Go RUSH!


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: johnoneil; malkin; rush
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-170 next last
To: Flyer

Is that you, the envy of about a million of your fellow FReepers, Flyer?

If so, ye are entrusted with a National Treasure there, Mate.

Got any plans for expressing your appreciation to slimeball Mattews for hitting on your beloved Wife last night?
I hope you don't mind that about a million of your fellow FReepers are right in love with her too!

I have a feeling komrade Mattews had best be staying clear of any dark allys for a while.

Blessings in abundance 2 both of ye!


141 posted on 08/20/2004 11:16:12 AM PDT by Uncle Jaque (Vigilance!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: TShaunK

RE:
"But if she just said that the self inflicted wounds did not necessarily mean intentional. "

I'm pretty sure she knows real well; it's just that Komrade M. wouldn't let the Lady get a word in edgewise!

You'd think she was trying to confirm a Federal Court Judge, for cryin' out loud!


142 posted on 08/20/2004 11:23:19 AM PDT by Uncle Jaque (Vigilance!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Nita Nupress

He's old enough to be her daddy.


143 posted on 08/20/2004 11:28:56 AM PDT by keysguy (Trust the media as far as you can throw them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: keysguy

RE: "you were great last night we are all proud of you""

***DITTOes, Aye!!!***

As for having her fill in for RUSH; He's gonna take next week off, eh?

Hullo, Michelle????

Can someone get a photo of Michelle, Rush, Ann, and Allan Keyes all together sometime? Maybe all dressed in red, white, and blue football jerseys?

Talk about our "Dream Team"!?

It'll make the libs utterly incontinent!!!

"Cleanup in Isle #13!" {8^{D~

UJ


144 posted on 08/20/2004 11:29:52 AM PDT by Uncle Jaque (Vigilance!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: keysguy
Malkin was great. It was Chris who lost it and went into hysterics, did not let Malkin to answer his question because they would have defeated his agenda. Then it turned out Chris had never read the book and they took HER book to check up on some fact.

Proud of the way Malkin handled herself on Hardball and on Rush.

Chris is definitely also a chauvinist. How has Chris handled strong women such as Ann Coulter and Gloria Allred or has he even had them on his show?

145 posted on 08/20/2004 11:30:33 AM PDT by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Jaque

A lot of people think that Tony Snow is on the radio due to the time he filled in for Rush, but you have to remember it's not for everyone.


146 posted on 08/20/2004 11:31:51 AM PDT by keysguy (Trust the media as far as you can throw them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: Dante3
If you notice closely many of the women chris has on his show are rat/groupies, not really women who think for themselves.
147 posted on 08/20/2004 11:33:32 AM PDT by keysguy (Trust the media as far as you can throw them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: ohioconservative
Somebody posted that they thought Michelle was "intimidated".

This is NOT "intimidated";





This is P!$$ED (Rightous Indignation)!!!


Even in wrath she's wickkid cunnin', ain't she?
148 posted on 08/20/2004 11:36:32 AM PDT by Uncle Jaque (Vigilance!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: HawaiianGecko
Michelle is a hard-nosed reseacher, exposing the truth of many myths.... I've personally never seen anyone successfully argue with her facts.

Generally yes, but she is out of her area of expertise when it comes to understanding the arguments of the SBVFT. She identifies sailors as soldiers and got flummoxed about the self-inflicted wounds. She should not be the one selected to defend the SBVFT positions nor should Rush for that matter. I am sure that Rush has not read the book either.

149 posted on 08/20/2004 11:37:57 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: gopwinsin04

Re:

"Chrissie Matthews stole her swift boat vets book!"

Prob'ly 'cause he couldn't find a copy down at the local book store. Seems they are under orders not to put them out, if not hide or "lose" them.

But that's pretty typical acquisition procedure for lib Komrades, isn't it?

I don't think Michelle will have a problem replacing her copy. I hope she kept her purse with her.


150 posted on 08/20/2004 11:40:47 AM PDT by Uncle Jaque (Vigilance!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: IGOTMINE

How do you contribute to them??? Can you post a link?


151 posted on 08/20/2004 11:42:49 AM PDT by cicero's_son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: ohioconservative

Re. "Michelle is married and has one child, I believe."

Well then; we'll just have to love 'em ALL! * {;^{D~


152 posted on 08/20/2004 11:45:58 AM PDT by Uncle Jaque (Vigilance!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: keysguy

Eewww. Good point. I never thought about that.


153 posted on 08/20/2004 11:51:16 AM PDT by Nita Nupress ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." Hillary Clinton, 6/28/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Jaque
Is that you

That's me, but just me at a book signing she did in Houston.

As you would imagine, she is a very, very nice person. There were very few people at the book store and we got to chat with her one on one for quite some time.

154 posted on 08/20/2004 11:55:34 AM PDT by Flyer (I will never reference my tag line in my posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: TShaunK
But if she just said that the self inflicted wounds did not necessarily mean intentional.

Max Cleland.

155 posted on 08/20/2004 11:56:40 AM PDT by laredo44 (Liberty is not the problem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: cicero's_son; IGOTMINE

Never mind...I found them at www.swiftvets.com

Just donated $100, my first contribution of the campaign season.


156 posted on 08/20/2004 11:58:05 AM PDT by cicero's_son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: cicero's_son

www.swiftvets.com, I think.


157 posted on 08/20/2004 12:25:23 PM PDT by IGOTMINE ("By God, I pity those poor bastards we're going up against. By God I do.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: kabar

I would hardly say that Michelle was flummoxed about the self-inflicted wounds. She wasn't given the opportunity to explain to Matthews and the audience that there is a difference between "self-inflicted" and "shooting oneself." Anyone knowing the material at hand as well as Maulkin typically does will tear a new hind end in a mouthpiece such as Chris Matthews that simply asks a question and then attempts to answer it for his guest. This woman will win a CX debate with Matthews on this subject simply because she is researching it and bringing forth facts to further the knowledge of the audience and Matthews is quite obviously upset at this story period. His viewpoint is colored with blind hatred and cannot be trusted. Matthews isn't researching material. He's quoting the NYTimes and Washington Post like they are some kind of forensic scientists. The truth is at a Navy base in tons of documentation taken during every single outing that Kerry had in Vietnam. All radio reports, all air craft witnessing ground movements exist, all AAR's exist. You don't see Matthews or is staff researching this material, but you do see Maulkin doing it.


158 posted on 08/20/2004 12:32:35 PM PDT by HawaiianGecko (Use in a well ventilated area)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: HawaiianGecko
You don't see Matthews or is staff researching this material, but you do see Maulkin doing it.

I agree Mathews hasn't done any research. He is a Dem attack dog. As far as Malkin is concerned, I think she read the book, but she doesn't have a grasp of the facts. I certainly know more than she does about the subject. My point is that she shouldn't speak on behalf of the Swiftees until she becomes more knowledgeable. She doesn't know what she is talking about and only detracts from their case. I heard her on C-SPAN this morning and on Rush this afternoon. She has to do her homework.

159 posted on 08/20/2004 1:44:22 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: cicero's_son
How do you contribute to them??? Can you post a link?

Click logo to donate.


160 posted on 08/20/2004 2:01:04 PM PDT by ohioconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-170 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson