1 posted on
08/20/2004 7:34:18 AM PDT by
tallhappy
To: tallhappy
This doesn't sound to me like FReepers, at all.
2 posted on
08/20/2004 7:40:08 AM PDT by
Old Sarge
(ZOT 'em all, let MOD sort 'em out!)
To: RonDog; AnnaZ; feinswinesuksass; DoughtyOne; Cinnamon Girl; Tony in Hawaii; Bob J; diotima; ...
3 posted on
08/20/2004 7:41:18 AM PDT by
tallhappy
(Juntos Podemos!)
To: tallhappy
Pleasse, people. The only people who read the LA Weekly or OC Weekly are college students looking for "massages" or the local party scene. Politics run left of Marx in the Weekly.
4 posted on
08/20/2004 8:02:45 AM PDT by
struggle
((The struggle continues))
To: tallhappy
Is the LA Weekly one of those free fliers that get piled up at grocery stores?
To: tallhappy
Wait a minute. That was actually a pretty fair and balanced article--and the Bolsheviks came out looking pretty stupid.
Good article.
6 posted on
08/20/2004 8:23:03 AM PDT by
Cogadh na Sith
(The Guns of Brixton)
To: tallhappy
I think this sounds like a fairly well-balanced article; nowhere in there does the writer try to make the Right look or sound like a bunch of kooks.
He's just reporting, which is all we should ask for.
9 posted on
08/20/2004 10:18:27 AM PDT by
Redbob
To: tallhappy
Thank you for posting this L.A. Weekly article.
I remember talking to their reporter...
...and I remember introducing him to Genevieve.
Overall, it seems that his report was fairly accurate, considering his perspective. ;)
Bottom line: OUR rally dominated his coverage, not the RAT's "anti-Bush" rally.
I consider THAT to be a success. :o)
12 posted on
08/20/2004 6:40:38 PM PDT by
RonDog
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson