1. Odd that Kerry didn't hype the "shrapnel" report for years, he bragged about everything else for years.
2. A shrapnel injury that necessitated that it not be removed is not the kind of injury that would cause him to not be hospitalized?
3. Was the "shrapnel" just something that would work itself out?
4. I'm not a doctor, but this "shrapnel" isn't near organs, and doesn't sound like it's near the bone. Don't you think he would halve had it removed sometime?
5. I find the whole matter suspect. And with his statement that he can still feel it, if it's been removed, he's toast. Someonw should ask him is it still in him and why he didn't have it removed.
This raises more questions than it answers....
Xrays, Xrays, Xrays.
Listen to this about the shrapnel wounds....
http://www.wbt.com/dynamic/jh/audio/play_media/play.cfm?mediatype=realaudio&path=http://www.wbt.com/dynamic/jh/audio&speed=100&ext=rm&MediaID=230