"Who will really read the Post? I hardly ever click on the page anymore. Too hard to access any articles, and I can read the summaries here. Circulation dwindles, and influence along with it."
This story was published first in the Post but now it is all over the media. One does not have to read the post to hear this story.
I don't know what that first post was talking about v the after action reports. None have been made public. Because we could then see if Kerry was responsible for the claims of small arms fire. They in no way discredited him because he's saying the same thing.
Let's see the after action reports filed by Kerry v the others.
Well buried in the Wash post story is this little item, when they claim Thurlow must have wriiten the cation report
For much of the episode, Kerry was not in a position to know firsthand what was happening on Thurlow's boat, as Kerry's boat had sped down the river after the mine exploded under another boat. He later returned to provide assistance to the stricken boat.
Now does that agree with the Pravda on Johnkerry.com or with the Swift Vets account that the departed kerry returned when it became evident there was no hostile fire?
Most media reports omitted that little item.