[Reaganwuzthebest]

Laci Peterson's furious mother called her son-in-law a "f---ing liar" and begged him to tell her where he ditched the body, it was revealed yesterday...

Is that all, she probably said a lot more than that. I'm still waiting to hear what this "potential development" is, perhaps results of fingerprints or other tests that may further prove Peterson's guilt or even exonerate him? I seriously doubt it has anything to do with a plea bargain.

[runningbear]

Not sure... the Modesto Bee is reporting; "About that same time, a prosecution representative phoned the Stanislaus County public defender's office to ask if the office had two compact discs containing 6,000 pages of documents in the case, a source there said. Two other sources confirmed that the inquiry was made."-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Not sure if this is the only thing Geragos is wanting to know if this has anything to do in relation in freeing his client?

[4everontheRight]

This is very curious. I am really starting to wonder what is going on here. I sure as poop hope he doesn't get away with this(uh, if he is guilty of course)

[Devil_Anse]

Reaganwuz, my friend, I don't see Scott being exonerated any time soon!

Listen to those tapes, if you haven't heard them in sequence yet. They are a real portrait!

Near the last few tapes, IMO, Scott is beginning to crack.

[wasnova]

"potential development"

Going by experience, I'd guess that the defense has a solid claim in re discovery, i.e., the prosecutor failed to turnover doc's that the defense had every right to; but which the prosecution is used to receiving judgments that the withholding thereof was inadvertent and was not a "critical" error.

Of course, this case will be different.

In this (unusual) case, the defense will be granted the discovery that was their right. Meanwhile, during the drawn-out procedure, they will let the key witness against them go without a good nights sleep.