[js1138]

No harm is describing unexplained things you see. Perhaps they can be explained later. I do, however, have reservations about objects seen at night that are described with precise altitudes and dimensions. (post#14)

I would be much happer with a description that described the angle of view and duration of the observation. The moon, for example, appears subjectively to cover a significant portion of the sky, but I am always shocked to hear what the actual coverage is.

[RadioAstronomer]

I agree completely. :-)