Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sinkspur
What is wrong with reparations, per se? Like I said, my objection is only to sending out checks. Weren't black families financially harmed by their ancestors being owned by other people?
198 posted on 08/17/2004 5:28:10 PM PDT by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies ]


To: B Knotts
Weren't black families financially harmed by their ancestors being owned by other people?

Yes. And those who were harmed are all dead.

Reparations to Holocaust victims were limited to the actual victims, not to generations yet-to-come.

Reparations, per se, are wrong. Blacks alive today have suffered not one bit from slavery. If you buy that argument, you've bought Jesse Jackson's argument for reparations.

222 posted on 08/17/2004 5:39:36 PM PDT by sinkspur ("Is it OK to send watered silk to the dry cleaners"?--Cardinal Fanfani)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies ]

To: B Knotts
Weren't black families financially harmed by their ancestors being owned by other people?

So in other words, if I can prove that my great-great-great-great-grandfather took an arrow in the back, I'll be "entitled" to free gambling at the Indian casinos?

370 posted on 08/17/2004 8:12:13 PM PDT by Don Joe (We've traded the Rule of Law for the Law of Rule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson