To: sinkspur
What is wrong with reparations, per se? Like I said, my objection is only to sending out checks. Weren't black families financially harmed by their ancestors being owned by other people?
To: B Knotts
Weren't black families financially harmed by their ancestors being owned by other people? Yes. And those who were harmed are all dead.
Reparations to Holocaust victims were limited to the actual victims, not to generations yet-to-come.
Reparations, per se, are wrong. Blacks alive today have suffered not one bit from slavery. If you buy that argument, you've bought Jesse Jackson's argument for reparations.
222 posted on
08/17/2004 5:39:36 PM PDT by
sinkspur
("Is it OK to send watered silk to the dry cleaners"?--Cardinal Fanfani)
To: B Knotts
Weren't black families financially harmed by their ancestors being owned by other people? So in other words, if I can prove that my great-great-great-great-grandfather took an arrow in the back, I'll be "entitled" to free gambling at the Indian casinos?
370 posted on
08/17/2004 8:12:13 PM PDT by
Don Joe
(We've traded the Rule of Law for the Law of Rule.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson