Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Alan Keyes on Reparations (AK contextualizes his comments)
The Illinois Leader ^ | 8-17-2004 | Chicago Bureau

Posted on 08/17/2004 2:38:57 PM PDT by unspun

Alan Keyes on Reparations

Tuesday, August 17, 2004

By The Leader-Chicago Bureau (admin@illinoisleader.com)

CHICAGO -- Republican U.S. Senate candidate Alan Keyes has just released a statement clarifying what appeared to be a surprising position he took at a news conference yesterday.

"I think a cogent argument could be made for reparations in principle," Keyes is quoted as saying to reporters yesterday, according to the Chicago Sun-Times.

The Chicago Tribune expanded:

Keyes gave a brief tutorial on Roman history and said that in regard to reparations for slavery, the U.S. should do what the Romans did: "When a city had been devastated [in the Roman empire], for a certain length of time--a generation or two--they exempted the damaged city from taxation."

Keyes proposed that for a generation or two, African-Americans of slave heritage should be exempted from federal taxes--federal because slavery "was an egregious failure on the part of the federal establishment."

The response from conservatives was immediate. "Who downstate will now vote for Keyes?" wrote IllinoisLeader.com reader Randall Mead of Springfield today. "I certainly won't."

This afternoon, Keyes released the following statement, clarifying his position:

I have consistently opposed the effort to extort monetary damages from the American people. As I have argued in the past, the great sacrifices involved in the Civil War represented the requital in blood and treasure for the terrible injustices involved in slavery. In this form the so called "reparations" movement represents an insult to the historic commitment that many Americans made to the end of slavery, which included the sacrifice of their lives.

I have also consistently maintained that the history of slavery, racial segregation and discrimination did real damage to black Americans, left real and persistent material wounds in need of healing.

In various ways through the generations since the end of slavery, America has tried to address this objective fact, but without real success. This was at least in part the rational for many elements of the Great Society programs of the sixties, and for the original and proper concept of affirmative action developed under Republican leadership during the Nixon years.

Unfortunately, the government-dominated approaches of the Great Society, which purported to heal and repair the legacy of historical damage, actually widened and deepened the wounds. They undermined the moral foundations of the black community and seriously corrupted the family structure and the incentives to work, savings, investment, and business ownership.

The idea I have often put forward to address this challenge involves a traditionally Republican, conservative and market-oriented approach: removing the tax burden from the black community for a generation or two in order to encourage business ownership, create jobs and support the development of strong economic foundations for working families.

This has the advantage of letting people help themselves, rather then pouring money into government bureaucracies that displace and discourage their own efforts. It takes no money from other citizens, while righting the historic imbalance that results from the truth that black slaves toiled for generations at a tax rate that was effectively 100 percent.

I have also made it clear that while I believe that the descendants of slaves would be helped by this period of tax relief, my firm goal and ultimate objective is to replace the income tax, and thereby free all Americans from this insidious form of tax slavery. It is well known that this is one of the key priorities of the Keyes campaign.

In response to Keyes' statement, conservative Jack Roeser of Family Taxpayers Network told IllinoisLeader.com, "I expect Keyes would say this is one of those interesting subjects to be talked about among people sharing ideas. Reparations is an impractical concept. Everybody in every category has been wronged in one or the other, and you cannot single one out."

Roeser continued, "Keyes is a man of ideas, and I expect he gets into discussions like this that are proper in their proper place, but that he would never vote for reparations. The problem with American politics is that people don't get into deep discussions."

© 2004 IllinoisLeader.com -- all rights reserved

______What are your thoughts concerning the issues raised in this story? Write a letter to the editor at letters@illinoisleader.com and include your name and town.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: Illinois
KEYWORDS: keyes; reparations
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 861-875 next last
To: Jim Robinson

Yes they are......but I'm not one of them. :-)


281 posted on 08/17/2004 7:06:42 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | View Replies]

To: cyborg

I don't think he does. I just don't think he cares. It's great. Go Alan.


282 posted on 08/17/2004 7:06:56 PM PDT by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7
It means some kid in Chi who never heard of of Milton Friedman might get a seed planted in his skull concerning the relationship between taxes & his disposaable income.

Yeah. He'll expect to get a free ride from those who actually pay taxes in this country.

Keyes can be Bulworth in this campaign & I think he should go for it.

Well, he'll be "Bull" something.

283 posted on 08/17/2004 7:07:39 PM PDT by sinkspur ("Is it OK to send watered silk to the dry cleaners"?--Cardinal Fanfani)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 277 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Doesn't EVER get him to win any race,though,does it?


284 posted on 08/17/2004 7:08:25 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies]

To: NYCVirago
And what, exactly, is the empowerment here -- empowerment to cause greater divisions between white and black in this country? Empowerment to discriminate on the basis of race?Empowerment to have middle-class white people pay the tax burden for black millionaires?

Basically, yeah, that's the way it seems to read.

I'm still kinda in shock. I was a long-time Keyes supporter (read my posting history if doubt it), but I gotta say that this is just... crazy.

All I can think to ask at this point would be something like, "Who dropped the LSD in Alan's koolade?"

285 posted on 08/17/2004 7:09:26 PM PDT by Don Joe (We've traded the Rule of Law for the Law of Rule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Don Joe

Why should it engender a race war? A tax break? If people are put over the edge by a tax break then they should get started already. The Indians get casinos free. These people that would get into a race war over a tax break should be glad they were born white and not black because they would have had to deal with far worse than a measy tax break. Having said that, tax holidays, breaks,reparations,etc. is NEVER GOING TO HAPPEN so don't worry.


286 posted on 08/17/2004 7:10:24 PM PDT by cyborg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

He's not going to win barring divine intervention & if that should happen we're better off. Relax.


287 posted on 08/17/2004 7:11:56 PM PDT by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 283 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

He's not going to win barring divine intervention & if that should happen we're better off. Relax.


288 posted on 08/17/2004 7:12:09 PM PDT by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 283 | View Replies]

To: Truthsearcher; NYCVirago
But don't you get it? The whole point of this is to use racial equality argument to get tax relief for everyone and turn the argument on the Dems. First get the tax relief for one group, then after a while point out how unfair it is only one group gets it, and you're faced with eitehr raising taxes for the group that gets it, or give the same relief to everyone.

Surprise, surprise, surprise. It's YOU that "doesn't get it".

Since when has the left had a problem with race-based preferential treatment?

You're gonna get the dems to turn away from "reparations" because they're UNFAIR to white people?

ROTFLMAO!

289 posted on 08/17/2004 7:12:55 PM PDT by Don Joe (We've traded the Rule of Law for the Law of Rule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian
More flip-flops. Can't he find some grown-ups to work on his campaign?

Flip flops?? People read the headlines that blare "reparations" because the media misreports and distorts and made the jump that Keyes was going to give every black 40 acres and a mule. Keyes is right..as a liberatarian you should be opposed to federal taxes on anybody. Keyes puts forth the idea of doing it for an entire population and you call it flip flop?

290 posted on 08/17/2004 7:13:02 PM PDT by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian
More flip-flops. Can't he find some grown-ups to work on his campaign?

Flip flops?? People read the headlines that blare "reparations" because the media misreports and distorts and made the jump that Keyes was going to give every black 40 acres and a mule. Keyes is right..as a liberatarian you should be opposed to federal taxes on anybody. Keyes puts forth the idea of doing it for an entire population and you call it flip flop?

291 posted on 08/17/2004 7:13:11 PM PDT by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

Well, I'm not going to stand in his way from trying, especially when there's no one else opposing Obama. If nothing else, Keyes is liable to pin the youngster's ears back a bit. Will be an interesting debate.


292 posted on 08/17/2004 7:13:44 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 284 | View Replies]

To: cyborg
"I'd want to know what Obama plans to unleash on Illinois if I was an Illinois voter."

It's a US Senate seat. What he plans to unleash effects the nation. He's a commie plain and simple.

293 posted on 08/17/2004 7:14:11 PM PDT by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 275 | View Replies]

To: cyborg
These people that would get into a race war over a tax break should be glad they were born white and not black because they would have had to deal with far worse than a measy tax break.

It's not a "War," cyborg.

It's resentment. Resentment for exempting an entire group of Americans from taxes because of their race.

Having said that, tax holidays, breaks,reparations,etc. is NEVER GOING TO HAPPEN so don't worry.

Candidates for office who propose things that they know are not going to happen are engaging in pandering.

294 posted on 08/17/2004 7:14:19 PM PDT by sinkspur ("Is it OK to send watered silk to the dry cleaners"?--Cardinal Fanfani)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 286 | View Replies]

To: cyborg
Why should it engender a race war? A tax break? If people are put over the edge by a tax break then they should get started already.

Well, I think that any form of "reparations" will very likely push some members of the "Unstable-American Community" over the edge, and you don't.

So let's just agree to disagree, and compare notes after "reparations" are instituted, should that ever occur, OK?

295 posted on 08/17/2004 7:15:56 PM PDT by Don Joe (We've traded the Rule of Law for the Law of Rule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 286 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7
He's not going to win barring divine intervention & if that should happen we're better off. Relax.

You're singing a different tune than you were a week ago.

We're NOT better off by having a man in office who believes in exempting Americans from taxes based on RACE.

296 posted on 08/17/2004 7:15:59 PM PDT by sinkspur ("Is it OK to send watered silk to the dry cleaners"?--Cardinal Fanfani)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 287 | View Replies]

To: spunkets

and everyone is talking about Keyes but what's Obama's view of reparations? Hmmmmmm... and with him it won't be any election time trial balloon either I guarantee you.


297 posted on 08/17/2004 7:17:00 PM PDT by cyborg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 293 | View Replies]

To: cyborg
and everyone is talking about Keyes but what's Obama's view of reparations?

He's against them.

298 posted on 08/17/2004 7:17:57 PM PDT by sinkspur ("Is it OK to send watered silk to the dry cleaners"?--Cardinal Fanfani)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 297 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
And the resentment such a plan would cause would make Selma look like a picnic.

Good Golly Miss Molly, fetch me the vapors!

Sinkie and I are in agreement about something!

299 posted on 08/17/2004 7:18:07 PM PDT by Don Joe (We've traded the Rule of Law for the Law of Rule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

Well I will have to disagree.


300 posted on 08/17/2004 7:18:26 PM PDT by cyborg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 294 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 861-875 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson