Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP: Republicans for Kerry organizing
Bucks County Courier Times ^ | August 17, 2004 4:29 AM | Hilary Bentman

Posted on 08/17/2004 11:55:44 AM PDT by rface

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
To: rface
"Sue Tinsman is taking that step. The 82-year-old lifelong Republican ticks off her beefs with Bush like clockwork. The war. The loss of international support. The economy. The environment. Education."

If Sue Tinsman is a lifelong Republican, I'll eat my shorts. She ticks off her beefs with Bush not like clockwork, but like DNC talking points.
61 posted on 08/17/2004 12:51:54 PM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rface

Bucks county is affluent, that's true. This is where New Hope is located, the artsy community of gays and leftist "intellectuals", now pseudo Republicans. Michener and Pearl Buck lived there.


62 posted on 08/17/2004 12:52:39 PM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rface

Try this http://www.fundrace.org/neighbors.php but they only have this election cycle.


63 posted on 08/17/2004 12:55:14 PM PDT by MindyW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Tarl
I have heard a few conservative Republicans, perhaps influenced through M. Savage say they will either vote for Nader or not vote as a "signal" to the Republican Party to stay on the Conservative track...

Count me as one of them!

but isn't that a bit politically self-serving since the end result could be a Kerry presidency...

Isn't it politically suicidal to reward a party that ignores you? What incentive will Republicans have to return to conservative ways?

knowing full well the danger such a presidency would place our country in.

What could be more dangerous than the current situation, where BOTH parties are destroying our country with unchecked immigration, big government and tyrannical laws like the PATRIOT Act?

People died to give us our right to vote,

Which is why I won't waste mine on a Republicrat like Bush!

Can our country survive two more Ruth Vader Ginsberg type justices...let alone the one who currently serves a life term?

That's what a Republican majority in the Senate is for.

64 posted on 08/17/2004 12:55:58 PM PDT by AppleButter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: rface

"We were misled during the Vietnam War ... and they're misleading us now," said Renschler"

This is the hypnosis of the Far left at work here. Only Kerry and his camp claim America was misled in Iraq. I am so tired of hearing we were misled. The only misleading is being done by the left misleading america into thinking that GW is a bad president. There were WMD's, Saddam evil, We were right to go to war.... What is the misled statement all about... Too many people watching Michael Moore movies. I think Michael Moore should be brought up on charges of sedition.


65 posted on 08/17/2004 1:04:08 PM PDT by tomnbeverly (Do not let the UN make decisions for the protection of the United States... VOTE for George W. Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coop
And who's to say it's a "mess", anyway? Difficult? Yes. Tougher than we expected it to be? Yes. But a "mess"? I don't think so...
66 posted on 08/17/2004 1:16:58 PM PDT by clintonh8r (Vietnam veteran against Jean-France Kerry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: rface

I agree .. just being a registered republican does not guarantee the person supports the repub policies. And .. any republican who votes for Carter - IS NOT A REPUBLICAN.


67 posted on 08/17/2004 1:17:39 PM PDT by CyberAnt (President Bush: The only way to Peace is through Victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AppleButter

Don't forget presidents use executive orders (remember Clinton) to get what they want!

As to spending...when you fight a war you spend money, sorry,that's the way it is!


68 posted on 08/17/2004 1:18:22 PM PDT by kaktuskid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: rface
"People get confused on it," said Frank Colon, a political science professor at Lehigh University. Some, said Colon, think Kerry favors gay marriage, partially because his home state is Massachusetts, the first to issue licenses to gay couples.

Only you are confused Franky. Kerry IS for gay marriage. You may be confused by his obfuscation and flip flops.

69 posted on 08/17/2004 1:19:10 PM PDT by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rface

Any Republican who was foolish enough to vote for Jimmy Carter is better off in the other party.


70 posted on 08/17/2004 1:19:26 PM PDT by quadrant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rface

Lifelong Republican voting for Carter - that must be a lie! There is not such a thing, besides - maybe she was with Kerry in Vietnam! LOL


71 posted on 08/17/2004 1:22:27 PM PDT by Inge C
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rface

72 posted on 08/17/2004 1:43:33 PM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rface

"I'm a moderate Republican, but I don't think our administration is currently moderate. It's extremely conservative. Kerry is a moderate Democrat."

What planet has she been living on? She's obviously a Liberal and merely defines 'moderate' as someone who agrees with her.


73 posted on 08/17/2004 1:44:42 PM PDT by nosofar ("I'm not above the Law. I am the Law!" - Judge Dredd)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bulwark

"Depends... I like to think of myself as fiscally conservative and you can imagine in that respect Bush has a been a huge failure. Upsetting to no end really."


I don't believe we ever had anything more than a "projected surplus" with Klinton, you cannot have a true surplus with the national debt continuing to rise as it was everytime I checked. Bush now has to face huge war costs while at the same time we are locked into spending increases mandated by past actions of both parties and the social security mess is beyond repair in my opinion.


74 posted on 08/17/2004 2:39:13 PM PDT by RipSawyer ("Embed" Michael Moore with the 82nd airborne.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: rface
Daryl Renschler said he's going to do something he has not done since 1976 - vote for the Democratic candidate for president.

In the era of Watergate and Vietnam, the lifelong Republican gave his support to Jimmy Carter. Today, nearly three decades later, Renschler finds himself again mistrusting the government and hating what he contends has become a quagmire of a war.

If the numbskull voted for Carter the caterer hes not a lifelong Republican !

Dontcha just love lieing wishy washy humans ?

75 posted on 08/17/2004 2:44:25 PM PDT by ATOMIC_PUNK (Sharing the world has never been Humanity's Defining Attribute)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rface
Daryl Renschler said he's going to do something he has not done since 1976 - vote for the Democratic candidate for president.

Daryl might want to ponder a moment as to how big a mistake he made in 1976. Heck, this year was the first time since 1980 that the 'Rats have allowed Jimmy Carter to speak at their convention. Two dozens years of shameful banishment at the hands of his own!

Today, nearly three decades later, Renschler finds himself again mistrusting the government...

Daryl mistrusts government so decides the fix is in giving power to the party that will only further increase the size and power of government? Duh!

Normally, a war unites a country. This one split it.

Daryl might want to ask himself why this war split our country. Could it be that the 'Rats have worked countless hours of overtime to ensure that our country is split?

Daryl, you're a dope.

76 posted on 08/17/2004 2:47:41 PM PDT by PeoplesRepublicOfWashington
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rface
"People are cross-pressured. They want to vote [on] certain issues but can't get it all with one candidate," said Hulse Thompson.

Then the answer is simple:

Vote for the candidate that will insure that we have a country in the future, where those "other issues" can be discussed and voted on.

Bush-Cheney
2004

77 posted on 08/17/2004 6:01:49 PM PDT by ApplegateRanch (The world needs more horses, and fewer Jackasses!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Archangelsk
Mayor Randy Kelly-St Paul
Ed Koch
(coupla majors)


one that I know, of course I know a few. From you're post It looks like you're assuming I don't know any personally and I know more than one democrat who's voting GWB in Nov.

Those types are pretty easy to find here in the South.
78 posted on 08/17/2004 7:07:06 PM PDT by CanisRex (Beware of altruism. It is based on self-deception, the root of all evil. --Lazarus Long)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: AppleButter

I respect your opinion, albeit sadly. My own thoughts on the Republican Party leaning off the Conservative track is not betrayal but an effort to become entrenched as the Majority. This requires concessions to attract some of their voter base away from them. This has worked to some degree to the point where they have no real issues to stand on. With a greater majority in the House and Senate AND a President who won't loom as a veto threat...the Republican Party could achieve some REAL fiscal reform and address urgent issues.

This wont work if Republicans cut the legs off their party. The Immigration issue is no small fix. The numbers are quite large of suspected illegals already in our borders. To remove this huge group would be quite expensive both financially and from admin/enforcement costs. The economy probably couldnt survive the sudden loss of their productivity. Just saying our own unemployed would fill those jobs is dishonest at best which is why you have to be realistic not just venting anger. The real solution will be both complex and costly so knee jerk reactions to thinking the President is ignorant of our border problems is absurd.

The Majority in the Senate that you boldly profess will keep Kerry and his ilk from getting more Ruth Vader types onto the Supreme Court Bench is tenuous at best. The Democrats are fully infiltrated by Liberals and in case you didnt notice...they have a "win at all costs strategy" to get their power back.

The threat is very real not illusory and if you really want to turn your back on an opportunity to restore the Country we all once knew then may you have peace of mind when the results roll in on Nov. 2nd.


79 posted on 08/18/2004 2:00:52 PM PDT by Tarl ("Men killing men, feeling no pain...the world is a gutter - ENUFF Z'NUFF")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan
and rich republicans to defect to Kerry

Rich Republican WOMEN will defect to Kerry, just as they did for Gore. Most affluent Republican men I know are still pulling the lever for Bush. The 2000 election exit polls in Bucks and other affluent suburban counties in the NE and Midwest showed that it was the women in these counties that went heavily for Gore, while the men still went for Bush (women outnumber us on election day you know).

Maybe if Bush puts in more appearances at an Oakland County "lifestyle mall" (you know, the ones with Pottery Barn and Restoration Hardware), the "ladies who lunch" will view him more favorably.

80 posted on 08/27/2004 2:03:18 PM PDT by Clemenza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson