Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: supercat

The problem with this approach is that much hurricane damage (and death) is due to parts of building flying into other buildings (and people). For example, much of the damage done to building which withstand hurricane winds, is done by parts of unsafe buildings and unsecured items flying into buildings which would otherwise suffer much less damage.

So built-in obselescence costs everyone money, and some people their lives.


14 posted on 08/16/2004 4:57:05 PM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Lorianne
The problem with this approach is that much hurricane damage (and death) is due to parts of building flying into other buildings (and people).

But does shoddy construction expose a homeowner (or insurance carrier) to liability from damage that parts of their home do to other properties?

If the insurance and liability practices create a moral hazard, that would suggest a problem with such practices.

17 posted on 08/16/2004 5:06:09 PM PDT by supercat (If Kerry becomes President, nothing bad will happen for which he won't have an excuse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson