1 posted on
08/16/2004 1:41:23 PM PDT by
Pyro7480
To: steplock; bvw; canuck_conservative; holyscroller; weegee; KC_Conspirator; Bahbah; Tamsey; ...
2 posted on
08/16/2004 1:42:10 PM PDT by
Pyro7480
(Sub tuum praesidium confugimus, sancta Dei Genitrix.... sed a periculis cunctis libera nos semper...)
To: Pyro7480
What a great idea! Draw attention to a crappy movie, and make people wonder what it is that those religious conservatives don't want you to see!
3 posted on
08/16/2004 1:45:21 PM PDT by
Lunatic Fringe
(This tagline was censored by freerepublic.com!)
To: Pyro7480
"It's okay. I'm a licensed therapist. I know what I'm doing." :)
4 posted on
08/16/2004 1:46:06 PM PDT by
KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
(I feel more and more like a revolted Charlton Heston, witnessing ape society for the very first time)
To: Pyro7480
Boycott, yes. Work to get it rated NC-17, yes. Ban? No. No matter how revolting you find it (and I would tend to agree with you, myself), banning is not the answer. People will see it anyway, and all banning does it give those behind it a martyr complex to use to their benefit. We simply cannot resort to banning that with which we disagree. We can work to show others how and why it is wrong, but banning is counterproductive, to say the least.
To put it another way, as my pop once told me, if you want to show people that a man who disagrees with you is dead wrong, you don't silence him. You give him a soapbox and invite others to hear him speak, then counter his claims and show how wrong he is.
6 posted on
08/16/2004 1:48:10 PM PDT by
Jokelahoma
(Animal testing is a bad idea. They get all nervous and give wrong answers.)
To: Pyro7480
a probable pedophile What's a probable peadophile? He either was one, or he wasn't.
7 posted on
08/16/2004 1:49:31 PM PDT by
Happygal
(Liberals - fully au fait with their 'rights', utterly ignorant of their responsibilities)
To: Pyro7480; ItsOurTimeNow; little jeremiah; scripter; lentulusgracchus; ArGee; Bryan
15 posted on
08/16/2004 2:06:35 PM PDT by
EdReform
(Support Free Republic - All donations are greatly appreciated. Thank you for your support!)
To: Pyro7480
Laura Linney (yum!) and Liam Neeson? They don't have any better offers coming in?
16 posted on
08/16/2004 2:11:07 PM PDT by
Rummyfan
To: Pyro7480
Kinsey was a mediocre zoologist with no qualifications at all for carrrying out the type of "study" he claimed to have done. His subjects were almost exclusively homosexuals, prostitutes and other low-lifes like himself.
To: Pyro7480
Are you sure it's not Bill Condom?
To: Pyro7480
Concerned Women for America have a campaign to force congressional hearings on the fraud Kinsey perpetrated on the American public. Hope it suceeds.
To: Pyro7480
Hey! That's a great Idea! Let's get our knickers all a twisted over a movie most people would probably never go and see, and get them all excited about going to see it because we've got our knickers in a bunch...
Can you say "Last Temptation of Christ"? I know you can
To: Pyro7480
This is an excellent page that sums up important issues from her book. Kinsey was a homosexual pedophile. Out of 1,746 children abused in the "sexual studies", only 7 were girls. Kinsey's own notes show that infants were sexually stimulated until screaming, crying and in convulsions.
http://www.fathersforlife.org/kinsey1.htm
32 posted on
08/16/2004 4:37:12 PM PDT by
Tamzee
(Tell me honestly, Honey... do these classified documents make me look fat?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson