Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jaguar1942
Your basic understanding of the 2nd law and how it relates to atoms and molecular structures is flawed.

Where did I mention any relation to atoms or molecular structures? I stated that the second law had to do with heat flow(that statement is simplistic). I then supported that statement by giving you a formula. Now leaves being piled up is very remotely removed from the second law. I argued against an example of raking by pointing out that heat has almost nothing to do with a pile of leaves. Your solipsistic mind has gone down one of your imaginary paths.

738 posted on 08/18/2004 10:21:15 PM PDT by AndrewC (I am a Bertrand Russell agnostic, even an atheist.</sarcasm>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 737 | View Replies ]


To: AndrewC

You didn't answer my question, I am off to other things at this point.

I am trying to understand your definition of the 2nd law.


739 posted on 08/18/2004 10:36:35 PM PDT by Jaguar1942 (Watch for a Kerry Meltdown in September, the man is not sane, he will explode on national TV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 738 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson