Yes, I know of him, as well as others.....
The bible should not be questioned is the basic tenet of many fundamentalist Christian groups, it is to be taken literally in all aspects, which I find a little ridiculous, but that's me.
The literalist cannot handle scientific dealving into these questions, because it will take their literalism and turn it on it's head, and in the process hurt their faith in their bible.
Others do not take the book as literally, and take it as it relates to them, and what they need to know, they need something, they open the book and God relates to them directly through the bible what they need at that specific point in their lives, to them, the bible is a book of God's stories that he uses to relate directly with us on a personal level.
The first have real problems with science, the second have no problems with science, because it cannot question the bible directly because the bible was never meant to be literal in any sense of the word.
It all depends on how you look at the bible, is it a personal gate to your own personal relationship with God, or is it a book telling you how to live every aspect of your life?
With literalists, science and religion are not compatible, with the other, science and religion are one and the same thing. It's thier own personal journey in which God is leading them.
Have I straightened that out?