[microgood]

Yes, I can, scientifically I can say without refute from scientists, that there is a natural cause for everything, incuding the formation of life from the primordial soup, to the evolution of Homo Sapien Sapiens from a small Shrew like mammal that lived 50-60 million years ago. And if I do not know what that Causation is or was, I say, I don't know yet.

There is science and then there is science. There are several evolutionists here at FR even that do not accept abiogenesis yet.

It is unproven and unprovable until you do it in a lab. I like the laws of physics much better. Of course primordial soup theory is probably better than political science theories, but the physical sciences are way ahead of the evolutionists. I figure you guys are about where physical scientists were when there were four elements: air,earth,fire and water (when it comes to abiogenesis and speciation).

[Jaguar1942]

I have no idea which hypothesis on abiogenesis is correct, or if the ones that exist are correct at all.

I am clueless as to what the real abiogenesis theory is even going to remotely look like, I can take some educated guesses, because that discipline has come a long way in a few short years.

I am most willing to say though, that abiogenesis will not have the statement "god did it" anywhere within it, when and if it is ever fully developed.

[Jaguar1942]

And will you stop with the evolutionist nonsense please, evolution is a scientific theory, not a religion.

Thank you

Those that understand that evolution has stood the test of time and of scientific inquiry do not take the theory on faith. It is a well established, actually one of the best established scientific theories there is.

Creationism, must be taken on faith, you have no proof.
it is religion, and there is nothing wrong with that.

BUT, evolution is not a religion, and by calling someone who understands evolution, an evolutionist, is basically putting them on the same level as a creationist, and the 2 are totally incompatible.

Creationism is faith based, there being no proof, except your faith in the bible.

Evolution is science, based on facts and conclusions based upon those given facts.

[VadeRetro]

It is unproven and unprovable until you do it in a lab.

And then "You've only proven Design!" Creationist Catch number ... Hmmmm ... 22.