Behe has published on Histone structure in J. Mol. Bio. and other journals.
The point being that therefore "ID" is true or proven? No.
The point being the type of weird denials and smears that go on here by the anti-Creationists are like the dem and lib tactics.
As an aside I wasn't able to read his book. It was too dull.
Hold on a second - you claim to be familiar with TIBS, and yet in number 26 you posted:
It's a peer reviewed article in a major journal and it does, to the mind of the debaters, have to do with ID.
TIBS is not a major journal and not peer reviewed, as you apparently know. Why did you refer to the Behe TIBS review as 'a peer reviewed article in a major journal'?
The point being the type of weird denials and smears that go on here by the anti-Creationists are like the dem and lib tactics.
Physician, heal thyself.
In other words, the article is nothing more than a smokescreen which actually has nothing to do whatsoever with ID.