[tallhappy]

Furthermore this isnt even a paper (its a review article)

It's a peer reviewed article in a major journal and it does, to the mind of the debaters, have to do with ID.

Your denial is weird.

If you creatinoid "buffoons" knew anything about Behe, you would realize he does NOT question common decent.

This is quite a non-sequitar. Are there voices in your head you are responding to?

[Right Wing Professor]

It's a peer reviewed article in a major journal

Nah, TIBS is a lightweight, newsletter-like journal for biochemists, in which they ask people to write little opinion pieces on where the field is going. Behe has done peer-reviewed research (though not recently) but this isn't an example of it.

[RightWingNilla]

It's a peer reviewed article in a major journal and it does, to the mind of the debaters, have to do with ID.

Actually it isnt "peer reviewed". There is no data in it. Journal editors frequently ask people in the field to write review articles on areas of their expertise. These things do not go through the usual anonomous review process.

And you again fail to explain how this is relevant to "Intelligent Design". Are we supposed to just take your word for it?

This is quite a non-sequitar.

Youre apparently an expert on this.