---
And a good thing too. Because based on the organization human genome, the "designer" must have been an incompetent putz.
---
ID also doesn't make moral judgements on the quality of the design. An inefficient design is still as much of a design as an efficient design. In other words, level of efficiency is irrelevant to the question of design.
What a great escape clause.
Doesn't make a moral judgement on the quality of the design.
Evolution shows that the Genome should look pretty confusing, there should be some that is used and some that aren't, some are tossed in randomly because they somehow fused into the DNA structure at some point.
ID would show that there is a minimum of unused DNA structure, that there would be a minimum of wasted space, the designer would have used as little as possible to make his designee to work.
DNA structure shows and evolution made the prediction, that the DNA structure would be loaded with DNA fragments that were either A: not used, or B: were used for a different purpose then they had orignally beeen.
ID makes no predictions, it is not helpful to science in any way shape or form, except to get creationists all excited about the possibility. Sorry to burst your bubbles, but it not scientific, and it sure as heck makes no predicitions, and it has not been helpful to science in the least.
Perhaps its time to rename the "theory" then...
NVID (not-very intelligent design)