Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/15/2004 1:05:20 PM PDT by Willie Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Willie Green
Some soldiers, however, are finding the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act can't protect them.

Why?

2 posted on 08/15/2004 1:06:40 PM PDT by luvbach1 (Leftists don't acknowledge that Reagan won the cold war because they rooted for the other side.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Willie Green

Don't these guys get paid by the government while they are employed? Too bad.


5 posted on 08/15/2004 1:15:47 PM PDT by tbird5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Willie Green

While the 1994 law strengthened previous protections, it doesn't help doctors, lawyers or small business owners who depend on maintaining a client base. It doesn't save jobs eliminated by plant closings or budget cuts. And it doesn't help injured troops who can no longer perform the work they once did.

Well by god it SHOULD


6 posted on 08/15/2004 1:23:14 PM PDT by Leatherneck_MT (Goodnight Chesty, wherever you may be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Willie Green
I'm not sure if it's true, but I got an email saying Sears has promised to keep the jobs for any of it's military employees open until they return. I bought a stove from them last week.
11 posted on 08/15/2004 1:44:50 PM PDT by keats5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Willie Green

I think it's a shame that these people have lost their jobs. But after reading the article, what are the employers supposed to do?

If someone receives an injury that makes it impossible for them to do their job, they should apply for disability. How can the employer be expected to rehire them? Rehire them to do what?

If a job is eliminated because the place went out of business, what are they supposed to do? Re-open the plant for one person?

"Chambers, the substance abuse consultant, agreed budget cuts left his former nonprofit employer no choice but to eliminate his job."

Yeah, and what are they supposed to do in that circumstance? Make the money magically appear? It's not as if the government is providing compensation to the employers to keep these jobs available.

"While the 1994 law strengthened previous protections, it doesn't help doctors, lawyers or small business owners who depend on maintaining a client base. It doesn't save jobs eliminated by plant closings or budget cuts. And it doesn't help injured troops who can no longer perform the work they once did."

Are we going to force people to stay with a doctor that's been deployed? Not allow someone to patronize another business or hire another lawyer? Bad things happen in this world, and the government CANNOT PROTECT YOU FROM EVERY BAD THING.

I think all of those with a legitimate complaint should pursue it vigorously, and I was happy to read that the government has been vigilant in their dealings with employers. But there are some things that no one can do anything about.


20 posted on 08/15/2004 3:20:45 PM PDT by DameAutour (It's not Bush, it's the Congress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Willie Green
Gill, the former Alabama police officer with an injured leg, had to give up a career that began in 1992 and followed in the footsteps of his father and brother. "My biggest concern is loss of income," he said.

Walking the beat isn't all police do, or does he not want to accept a desk job? Sounds more like he's not resolved with his injury. I have sympathy for those who come back to small businesses to find there is no job but this guy needs to buck up.

28 posted on 08/15/2004 4:53:15 PM PDT by mtbopfuyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Willie Green
Increasing numbers of National Guard and Reserve troops who have returned from war in Iraq and Afghanistan are encountering new battles with their civilian employers at home. Jobs were eliminated, benefits reduced and promotions forgotten.

Perhaps, however two of my workers have been on duty for almost two years and they WILL have their job when they return, get paid by our company ALL differential in pay so they maintain their same income, and are highly respected and appreciated for their service while on duty!

34 posted on 08/15/2004 6:24:13 PM PDT by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Willie Green

Something has to be done about this. If their job has been eliminated, we should find them another or they should be allowed preference in a civil service job if they want.


39 posted on 08/15/2004 6:46:05 PM PDT by McGavin999 (If Kerry can't deal with the "Republican Attack Machine" how is he going to deal with Al Qaeda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Willie Green
Some soldiers, however, are finding the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act can't protect them.

Seems like upholding the law is just not politically correct these days. Immigration laws, election laws, marriage etc...why should Reservists expect their protections under the law to be enforced??? Who do they think they are, someone special or something? Get in line, take a number.../sarc/

42 posted on 08/15/2004 7:00:22 PM PDT by TADSLOS (Right Wing Infidel since 1954)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Willie Green
They should sue. They can claim that since the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act guarantees their jobs upon return, the factories and service centers MUST return from China and India respectively.

Convoluted, yeah. But what the hey? A backdoor back...to longstanding protectionist policies we threw out for global socialism via wage equalization.

Good, bad? Who cares anymore? The globalist train is gathering steam, and it ain't coming back. I say...go with the flow.

45 posted on 08/15/2004 7:13:57 PM PDT by guitfiddlist (Hate is a DNC Family Value)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Willie Green

I remember hearing of some law guaranteeing them employment, what happened here?

Also, I was told, by my boss, that when I left for the USMC, they were required to re-hire me at my position with all raises and promotions when I returned, but only once!

Maybe that is the cath, it has to be your first enlistment or something.


76 posted on 08/17/2004 2:16:12 AM PDT by RaceBannon (God Bless Ronald Reagan, and may America Bless God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub; LaDivaLoca; Kathy in Alaska; MoJo2001; Fawnn; Bethbg79; bentfeather; ...

Ping to you


79 posted on 08/17/2004 7:33:28 AM PDT by M0sby ((PROUD WIFE of MSgt Edwards USMC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks; The Sailor; kjfine; Old Sarge; USAF_TSgt; darkwing104; txradioguy; Long Cut

Ping to some Canteen Regulars


80 posted on 08/17/2004 7:34:36 AM PDT by M0sby ((PROUD WIFE of MSgt Edwards USMC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Willie Green

Sorry, soldier, you've been outsourced... Ah the smell of patriotism in the morning..


90 posted on 08/17/2004 7:59:43 PM PDT by Havoc (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson