[Blue Jays]

Hi Bonaparte-

The case is not Insurance Company vs. Dunn, it's State of California vs. Dunn, so the insurer isn't laying out scads of money at this point. It is, however, a great chance for them to bolster their ability not to cover the wacky professor. Look at the web site I posted earlier, the insurance companies would put you or me on that list if we so much as called in to learn about our coverage for burst waterpipes....

Graffiti elsewhere and then driving to the parking lot? I suppose it's possible, but I can't think of anywhere I could have gone on my college campus to do something like this without someone seeing the crime being committed. Like I said, possible, but it doesn't seem likely...

Regards,

~ Blue Jays ~

[Bonaparte]

"The case is not Insurance Company vs. Dunn, it's State of California vs. Dunn..."

In order to bring charges of insurance fraud against an individual, the police and DA need a criminal complaint from the victim, from the aggrieved party. That's the insurance company. This is an entirely criminal matter, not a civil matter. The title of the case is always going to be something like "state of California v. Jones" or "People v. Jones."

And the insurance company did not press charges against her because they read something in the newspaper. They did so because their investigation revealed that she defrauded them.

Give me a break.

"...I can't think of anywhere I could have gone on my college campus..."

We're not talking about your campus, we're talking about hers. You have no idea what's "likely" on that area of her campus. My guess is that you've never even been there.