Geneva O. is a leftwing biased journalist.
I am not even reading most of her barf-alert material to bother to debunk it. Nowhere do they bother asking if 34 days straight of front-page Abu Graib stories was a bit much for the New York Times, but they have time to second guess themselves for being too hawkish pre war. gack.
Asking geneva if she is part of the biased liberal media is like asking a fish if it feels wet.
The press put out 10,000 pictures of Abu Ghraib, but not one frame of Saddam's Torture Tapes.
Why?
Because the Torture Tapes stills are 10,000 times worse than anything you've seen about Abu Ghraib ---and images drive the news.
Dear Geneva was once the ombudsperson for the self-same Washington Post. I imagine she was asked to leave.
I suspect this because of the way she tended to respond to criticism. In an e-mail exchange, she once referred to me as "a racist, homophobic David Duke-type". I had merely questioned her defense of the paper's silence on the Jesse Dirkhising case (as opposed to the Matthew Sheppard case).
"Good grief!", thought I. For all she knows, I could be an advertiser -- and she's just gone out of her way to insult me.
My guess is she did this one too many times. And, eventually, insulted an advertiser...or a stockholder...or one of top management's family.
So, biased? Yep. And stupid, too.