Maybe Dubya will follow in the footsteps of the 1st President George W. that won unanimous (electoral college) elections.
Oh yes, Washington was his last name.
MEGA- 
Stay Strong
Fuzzy
Posted on 08/14/2004 6:53:37 PM PDT by doug from upland
Welcome.
The 'party faithful' won't believe anything presented to them, they'll claim it's fabricated or someone else's fault.
And yes, undecideds may look at facts and make informed decisions.
(Though in my area I'm not so sure! Just recently heard a woman at the DMV scream that she shouldn't be expected to actually have to READ anything before applying for her driver's license.)
*chuckle*
Have fun, happy FReeping.
Just as long as my typo doesn't end up in FR lore like 'stuned' and 'beeber' it'll be great.
;-)
Maybe Dubya will follow in the footsteps of the 1st President George W. that won unanimous (electoral college) elections.
Oh yes, Washington was his last name.
MEGA-
Stay Strong
Fuzzy
Sorry, but!
TALKING PINTS is too good to let go.
You're in the historical category now.
Question is; will you be remembered?
Probably not.
*chuckle*
Which will be a good thing, trust me.
He also voted against Nixon, which freaked both Nixon and the left out. He also stated that if Edwards had won the nomination he would vote for Edwards for President. This is what makes his book virtuous...he has known exactly what Kerry will do and say to win for 33 years.
>>> He also voted against Nixon, which freaked both Nixon and the left out ... This is what makes his book virtuous
I'm late to the party ... but ...
O'Neill WORKED for Nixon, was recruited by Colson. He clerked for Bill Rehnquist. And he gave money to Bush's father in '92. He can talk about how he voted for Perot, Gore, McGovern or whoever all he wants, but it is complete bull considering his track record with the GOP. Every time the guy has ever given money in a federal election it has been to a Republican.
I am all for putting a little something out there when it cannot be disproven (i.e., a vote) but this one doesn't pass the smell test. No libs are being won over by that and they don't believe it.
Jeez, and you'd think that Dan Rather would have mentioned this.
(crickets chirping)
He didn't, did he?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.