Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lelio

How did he do in 2000?

He predicted Gore. His answer is that he was right about the popular vote (different article).


20 posted on 08/14/2004 4:32:02 PM PDT by labard1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: labard1

When an election gets as close as it was in 2000, it's almost impossible to predict with much confidence who will win. He's applied his model all the way back to 1916 and it holds up surprisingly well.


23 posted on 08/14/2004 4:35:16 PM PDT by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: labard1

"How did he do in 2000? He predicted Gore. His answer is that he was right about the popular vote"
First of all I'm not so sure "Incumbency" applies to Vice Presidents. Secondly, he was actually quite accurate in that. Few people would have predicted gore to win the day before the election. I was a democrat at the time and even me and my freinds were predicting that Gore would lose by up to 10 points.


24 posted on 08/14/2004 4:35:44 PM PDT by Betaille ("Show them no mercy, for none shall be shown to you")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson