This is Photoshop fake.
Those on the left had the sun on their left side.
Those on the right had sun on their right side.
The shadows indicate fraud OR that Earth had two suns that day.
Posted on 08/14/2004 7:15:31 AM PDT by stayout
If Alston was replaced on 28 February 1969, how does he end up back on the boat two weeks later?
The picture gives the impression of heat. Two of the men are in T-shirts, two are without shirts. Alston is wearing a black T-shirt and a camoflaged shirt. It just appears odd.
Hmmm? An article that gives credence to the doctored photo theory.
Clearly the man on the far left is without his tags and it appears that Kerry is also without his tags.
Of course, it may just be that they were being 'sensitive'.....who knows.
This is Photoshop fake.
Those on the left had the sun on their left side.
Those on the right had sun on their right side.
The shadows indicate fraud OR that Earth had two suns that day.
ping - like minds
It does not prove that Alston NEVER (as in February or March 1969) was part of Kerry's crew, or that Alston was NEVER on a mission with a flotilla of Swift boats, one of which Kerry skippered.
It appears that Kerry and Alson served together, using an appropriate defintion of the word "served." That is, even if Alson was never part of Kerry's crew, or was never on a boat in a flotilla that had Kerry in it, he can still serve with Kerry, much as many of the Swiftees did.
Or there was a flashbulb.
Right next to a crate of oranges. All swift boats carried these provisions so the crew wouldn't get scurvy on long voyages.
That detail strikes me as a little strange, too. Prehaps they were on their way home from the grocery store when they were attacked.
Yes, he is.
How many "clarifications" does this make for Mr. Brinkley now?
Why would this surprise anybody? He took people who never even served in Vietnam to testify before Congressional committees.
I want to know who pays those guys' expenses.
That's true regarding the Swift boat vets but wouldn't you agree that kerry and Alston's service together is a fairly visible part of kerry's campaign? He is, after all, part of kerry's "Band of Brothers". I believe that Alston has made more than a few very passionate speeches about his service with kerry.
Could this be just one more piece of a totally fraudulent campaign?
The photo is consistent with a picture being taken with the subjects looking directly into the sun.
All this speculation does is make it easier to discredit this.
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. We need records that indicate that Altson was elsewhere from 30 Jan to 28 Feb. Since he'd suffered a head wound, it's certainly reasonable to conclude that he'd not be returned to duty for 4 weeks, but we need proof.
Another thing which this brings to mind is the question of how the hole left by Alston was filled until 28 Feb. It's possible that people were borrowed from other boats on a mission by mission basis. IIRC Alston was the forward gunner, just as Stever Gardner was. Gardner says he served on Kerry's boat while Kerry was OIC. Was it during this period? If it was, that would explain why records do not show Gardner assigned to Kerry's boat, he could have been a loaner. Perhaps his boat was down for repairs or something and so he was loaned to Kerry's crew to fill in for Alston? It's an interesting possibility at least.
Not to mention the fact that 3 of them have regular fatigues, Alston has on one type of camo and the guy in the white t-shirt is wearing sand colored camo (which I don't think was used in 'Nam.
No I don't think this photo is doctored.... but look at the circumstances of the picture.
You have Alston standing there in his full uniform (BDU's), while the rest of the crew is in a very relaxed state of dress.
To me it looks like the swift boat crew just came back from patrol, saw their friend Alston on the dock and said "hey, let's get a picture Alston."
Yancy
That detail strikes me as a little strange, too. Prehaps they were on their way home from the grocery store when they were attacked.
Oranges I could easily understand. You wouldn't need any kind of galley for the crew to eat oranges while out on a patrol. But potatoes?? As I said, this makes no sense to me whatsoever.
Maybe that grocery store was in Cambodia. (yeah, that's the ticket.)
No I don't think this photo is doctored.... but look at the circumstances of the picture.
You have Alston standing there in his full uniform (BDU's), while the rest of the crew is in a very relaxed state of dress.
To me it looks like the swift boat crew just came back from patrol, saw their friend Alston on the dock and said "hey, let's get a picture Alston."
Yancy
Thanks, Stayout.
Sorry, bud - I wanna believe that Kerry is faking photos - because that would be a great bombshell, but I think your analysis is wrong.
The sun appears to been above and in front of the subjects. That is, if you look at the picture on your computer screen while standing up, the sun is probably somewhere near your eyes.
Based on the specific angle that each man is standing at, the shadows *appear* to be caused by light sources coming from different directions. The subjects on the left side of the picture are angled with there right shoulders forward. The subjects on the right side have their *left* shoulders slightly forward. The guy in the middle is facing almost directly forward, so his shadow falls directly below his chin.
Finally, you can tell they are facing into the sun because they are all squinting to some extent.
So - no dice on the Photoshop fake.
But the evidence supporting the assertion that Alston never served under Kerry is not perfectly water tight, IMO.
For example, it's possible that Alston served sometime between January 29 and February 28 (when Fred Short was onboard and described as an replacement for a wounded David Alston), and that his absence on Feb 28 was for "routine" follow up treatment, or treatment of a complication such as infection. Likewise, the fact that Alston was not on Kerry's boat on March 13 only proves March 13.
I don't discount the theory, mind you, and am inclined to think that the Alson served under Kerry story is a lie, that was to have been supported by the January 1969 Spot Reports. Kerry's campaign web site had January 1969 action listed, and creditied Kerry with being there (he was not). The Alston connection may be a minor piece of the lie that just wasn't tied up when the other material was removed.
Oh, what tangled web we weave ...
A flashbulb would 1) make shadows BEHIND them
and 2) would lessen the shadows.
Ergo, it is a fake, consistent with Kerry and his ilk.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.