(......record? My guess is there is something really big in his past that he is happy no one is stumbling on while we harp away at something that doesn't even matter.....)
I think you are a wise person, and I agree with you. Is it something in his pre senate or senate days, all of which he glossed over. We think it's because of the liberality, but, is it something darker.
Re: Posts # 78 & 216
You may find this interesting. On another thread
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1191672/posts?page=33#33
we discussed Cal Thomas' interview with both John O'Neill and Hurley. Many thought it was a sucky interview. Several of us thought it as a good one. (I do not know if there is a rebroadcast on Sunday or in the wee hours of Monday morning, it might be worth your while to check listings)
In Posts 31 & 33 I made what I thought was an interesting observation.
Short version:
O'Neill and Hurley were debating. O'Neill presented facts. Hurley did the "Liar, Liar, Pants on Fire" "Those Wascly Webulicans!!!" routine. Cal got in a good zinger about George Soros.
Cambodia came up. "It was late. It was dark. They were on the river. There are no 'Welcome to Cambodia Signs'." Hurley's affect changed ever so slightly, but change it did.
I thought it would be an Ah-Ha!!! moment, because Hurley was talking about Christmas (fired on from the banks story). Then he lamely added something about he WAS there in January.
-Maybe he had a brain fart & forgot what version to tell
-Maybe for the first time we saw a chink in the armor
-Maybe, as many believe, there is more shit to hit the fan.
As I said last night---Something made him sweat some major bullets. And O'Neill was grinning like the cat who swallowed the canary.
If there is something else, what could it be? It has to be something big. Could O'Neill know of something in those records that would make Kerry's candidacy DOA? Or could it be something else we are not aware of?