Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: monday

I think the $30 figure for oil shale is a little old. I saw that figure in 1980 or so. The waste material (processed shale) is also a problem... It becomes 33 percent larger after the oil is harvested.


30 posted on 08/13/2004 12:09:41 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: Eric in the Ozarks

"I think the $30 figure for oil shale is a little old. I saw that figure in 1980 or so."

It is. It is actually a bit less expensive now. When oil was at $26 a barrel in 1998 tests were being conducted by the Canadian gov't. If prices would stablize at anywhere near their current $40+ per barrel price, shale oil would go into production permently.

"The waste material (processed shale) is also a problem... It becomes 33 percent larger after the oil is harvested."

Whats the problem with that? Use it to build up low lying coastal areas which are about to go under water due to global warming...hehe. Might make good ski slopes too.


46 posted on 08/13/2004 2:26:14 PM PDT by monday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson