Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hushpad
>>(don't know if by law, they don't have to, if thats true, its stupid)<<

The landmark Supreme Court case, Branzburg v. Hayes took care of this some time ago.

With rare exception, reporters are not legally allowed to protect their sources.

21 posted on 08/13/2004 9:50:51 AM PDT by evad (You cannot start with a false premise and arrive at a valid conclusion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: evad

Thanks. I always wondered how reporters got away with not "answering to the judge", now I know they can't.

In light of this new knowledge, I believe at least 95% of reporters belong in jail (for something).


23 posted on 08/13/2004 9:57:36 AM PDT by hushpad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson