Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EllaMinnow

I have a theory about this.

Actors started poor, working in restaurants, keeping miserable jobs. Basically, poor. So they were always supportive of politicians that believed in helping the poor.

When these actors finally hit it big, they spent some time enjoying their new found wealth. Capitalism at its best.

Once they became irrelevant, where no one really cared who they were, they felt guilty and believed they needed to go back to their roots, of course while not giving up their life of luxury.

Now take into account that Hollywood is making this a new cottage industry, they are trying to out Marxist each other in a bid to once again capitalize on this.

The problem is they really do not care. They can hide behind the gates to their villas and use the press to forward their agendas. I think the term is "Limousine Liberal"


4 posted on 08/13/2004 7:39:04 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz ("If you control the information given to society, you control society. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: EQAndyBuzz
Interesting theory, however I think that entertainers spend too much time playing different roles that they lose or never develop a real character for themselves. To act, you have to become, in your imagination, a fictional character. You have to become that person to be convincing. The imagination is very powerful element of our thought processes.
7 posted on 08/13/2004 12:43:48 PM PDT by UpInArms (Benedict Arnold was a war hero too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson