Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: adiaireton8
If in act is not a good kind of act, then there are no motives or circumstances that can make it a good act.

Shooting someone dead is clearly not a "good act", but it's trivially easy to describe circumstances (self-defense) under which it is ethically appropriate to do so.

174 posted on 08/12/2004 5:18:52 AM PDT by steve-b (Panties & Leashes Would Look Good On Spammers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies ]


To: steve-b
Shooting someone dead is clearly not a "good act", but it's trivially easy to describe circumstances (self-defense) under which it is ethically appropriate to do so.

Murder is not a good kind of act. Hence, murder is never justified. But a good kind of act can have evil results. An act of self-defense is a good kind of act, all other things being equal. Therefore, the death or injury of an attacker, as a result of an act of self-defense, is not necessarily unethical. If the act goes beyond what is necessary for self-defense, however, then it is no longer an act of self-defense.

-A8

181 posted on 08/12/2004 7:14:17 AM PDT by adiaireton8 ("There is no greater evil one can suffer than to hate reasonable discourse." - Plato, Phaedo 89d)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson