I just heard John O'Neill say Rassman spent two days on Kerry's boat. So, my point is still valid: How does someone who spends less than 48 hours with Kerry become an authority on his qualifications to be Commander in Chief, and the guys who were with him day and night, aren't?
"I just heard John O'Neill say Rassman spent two days on Kerry's boat. So, my point is still valid: How does someone who spends less than 48 hours with Kerry become an authority on his qualifications to be Commander in Chief, and the guys who were with him day and night, aren't?"
Yes it is. So why is everyone so quiet about Rassmann and his story?
I don't care that he shot a fleeing VC in the back. But I do care that he, if what the swiftees say is true (and I for one believ them), then Kerry filed false reports repeatedly.
Even that I wouldn't care about. Those sleeping dogs are best left sleeping but Kerry woke them up and now he has to face the truth.
The worst part of this whole deal is the number of journalists refusing to do journalism. Was the Doc on duty that day? Easy to check.
Was Kerry in Cambodia? Ask his crew.
Was their incoming fire from the banks that day? There were at least 20-30 men there besides Kerrys crew, find them and ask.
The list is endless. O'Reilly, and the rest have abdicated their responsibility as journalists.
Hannity is searching for the truth despite his sometimes annoying ways. In my book, Hannity is the driving force behind the story seeing the light of day and I'll remember that for a long time.