Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin

The article also fails to mention that the NYT article specificly attributes the leak to Pakistani officials, and that the US officials simply confirmed the information.


6 posted on 08/10/2004 8:45:49 AM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Eva

According to what I've read so far, Washington only confirmed the name after the story broke.

The information appears to have come to the New York Times from another source.

I'm in favor of hitting the New York Times with a huge fine for interfering in anti-terrorist operations. Just on principle.


11 posted on 08/10/2004 8:49:30 AM PDT by coconutt2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Eva
Back in WWII the press were given access to all kinds of classified information and told to sit on it. They did. The press back then were hoping that the US would win the war.

Things have taken a dramatic turn. The press cannot be trusted with any information. The Major Media Press, particularly the LA Times and the NY Times are actively working to undermine our war effort both in Iraq and in the war on terrorism.

That being said, whoever allowed this leak to get to the NY Times should be fired and prosecuted. We need to make it clear to every member of the administration that the NY Times and Al Queda are on the same side in this war and giving informatikon to anyone who might give it to the NY Times is the same as giving the information directly to Osama Bin Laden.

42 posted on 08/10/2004 10:04:00 AM PDT by P-Marlowe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson