Posted on 08/10/2004 12:04:33 AM PDT by Conservative Firster
Immigration and homosexual "marriage" are shaping up to be the most contentious issues facing Republican platform writers in the weeks before the party's national convention, convention officials said.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
Recommended reading:
Kerry Reaches Out to Disaffected Republicans (to conservatives unhappy with Bush)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1188465/posts
But some analysts believe Kerry has a chance to pick up a few votes because of conservative dissatisfaction with free trade, record budget deficits and continuing violence in Iraq.
Seeking to bring back some of these folks, Kerry has adopted a number of arguments during his national tour. They include: Bush is more radical than conservative. In his stump speeches, Kerry says "there is nothing conservative" about piling up debt through record budget deficits, the "rush to war" in Iraq, or enforcement of the Patriot Act under Attorney General John Ashcroft.
Republicans, reclaiming the conservative mantle, said Kerry's default response to deficits is higher taxes. They also pointed out that Kerry voted for the Patriot Act and potential military action in Iraq, yet turned against both for political reasons. I'm more like you than you realize. Putting a premium on stops in rural areas, Kerry stresses his agreement with conservatives on certain cultural issues.
Tancredo ans Schlafly are both Anti-Bush. Tancredo's website/organization is run by Pat Buchanan's sister. Schafly is a professional fundtraiser who specializes in appealing to Bush haters.
The GOP is already MIA on immigration.
If they surrender and accept gay marriage, I walk.
Phyllis Schlafly who has been a major force in the Republican party for 40 years, and wrote some of the seminal works that lead to the reagan revolution?
I wonder how blasting Schafly and Tancredo is heiping to elect Bush? Alienating conservatives and forcing them to stay home or go third party is not the way to elect Bush.
There is a group of Republicans, who think of themselves as conservatives, but in reality they base their views on whatever the WSJ op ed pages and Limbaugh thinks, sort of like monkey see, monkey do, and its sad really. Since people dare question the conservatism of others, they start with the personal attacks against them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.