Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nonesuch; Alamo-Girl; backhoe; Woahhs; Victoria Delsoul; William Wallace; Bryan; aristeides; ...

"Everybody wants to talk about how a handful of cells is more important than the person in whom those cells are embedded." Sadly, you toss about typical liberal mischaracterizations, revealing yourself to be of that mindset. You too are but a mass of cells, physically, but we give you the benefit of characterizing you as a member of the human family ... and you've been that since your unique conception. It is important to not lose sight of this distinction since science will soon be able to conceive and life support an individual without ever embedding in a woman's body. It is by design that we humans collectively class our species as of greater value than other species on this blue orb. To purposely dehumanize one age in our individual lifetimes, because the individual humans at that age have utilitarian value for medical applications to treat older individuals is in fact an embrace of cannibalism. Congratulations. Your sounding brass verbiage and tinkling cymbal liberal pleas are disgusting in the main. As a functioning mass of cells, you're failing to follow your own syllogistic standards. For those I pinged to this exchange, the posts of nonesuch would be instructive of the Gordian tangle of mischaracterizations typical to liberals defending abortion on demand as some sacred rite for women.


63 posted on 08/21/2004 8:29:37 AM PDT by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]


To: MHGinTN

BTTT!!!!!!!


64 posted on 08/21/2004 8:33:30 AM PDT by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

"... you always have a choice, always have the right to withdraw your consent." Pure liberal bilde wash ... try withdrawing life support from your crib-bound infant and see how fast the 'compelling interest to protect individual life' is applied by the state. And that's just one example of the 'falsehoods sprinkled liberally' methodology used by those defending the indefensible serial killing they believe is essential to enlightened society, essential to empower 'modern' women.


65 posted on 08/21/2004 8:34:31 AM PDT by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

To: MHGinTN

It always astonishes me that libs "feel" that their belief systems trump our Christian moral principles. Our founders told us that we are endowed by our Creator with certain "unalienable rights", but the atheistic left would rather ignore our founders and our Creator. By doing so they also ignore any semblance of objectivity and sense of right and wrong. They wish to free themselves from the constrains of God and promote full blown anarchy instead. Do they actually believe that all belief systems are equally valid? I often wonder if these are the same people and mindset that would have killed the American Indians or enslaved Africans... since they are so comfortable at defining who is worthy to be called HUMAN.


72 posted on 08/21/2004 8:54:55 PM PDT by I got the rope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson