Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

N. Korea: PLA Practiced River-Crossing at Yalu River(China threatening N. Korea?)
Chosun Ilbo ^ | 08/08/04 | Choi Heub

Posted on 08/09/2004 7:17:38 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster

/begin my translation

N. Korea: Chinese PLA Practiced River-Crossing at Yalu River

People's Liberation Army(PLA) of China practiced river-crossing using pontoon-bridge last month at Yalu river, Japanese Sankei Daily reported on 8th (of August), quoting RENK(Rescue The North Korean People), an organization for helping N. Korean escapees.

PLA practiced installing 10 sections of pontoon bridges, which are 5~7m wide, 20~30m long. The installed bridges stretched to the middle of the river where the border lies, starting from a shore, which is 30 minute drive upstream from Dandong, Liaoliang Province, a border city of China. The training had been going on for two weeks since the early July. It is estimated that 1,000 men were involved (in the training), according to Sankei (Daily.)

The pontoon bridge installed recently by PLA for river-crossing exercise at Sino-N. Korean border. A member of Japanese organization for helping N. Korean escapees(Rescue The North Korean People:RENK), took this picture from inside a car and got it published.

It is unusual that PLA conduct such training at the Sino-N. Korean border. It is viewed as a measure to beefing up border security related to N. Korean escapees. However, some argue that this is a way of pressuring N. Korea to give up nukes.

Since China transferred the security of the border area from People's Armed Police to PLA, PLA's border security unit must have been the one conducting the exercise, Sankei (Daily) reported.

/end my translation


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bordersecurity; china; exercise; nkorea; nukes; pla; pontoonbridge; rivercrossing
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
A RENK member saw a few hundred PLA soldiers in action. However, he also saw 100 tents in the field, each of which can house 10 people. That is how he came up with the estimate of 1,000 soldiers participating the exercise.

Anyway, Chinese river-crossing exercise is a provocative move. However, if Chinese had wanted to give a real good impression, they should have done it on a much larger scale, including heavy armors, paratroopers, and air cover.

Some in S. Korea have begun to worry that Chinese will invade to oust Kim Jong-il and install a pro-Chinese regime in N. Korea while grabbing a chunk of N. Korean territory. We will see what the real Chinese intention is.

1 posted on 08/09/2004 7:17:38 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Maybe our next major militaty execercise should be on the Rio Grande.


2 posted on 08/09/2004 7:19:05 AM PDT by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; AmericanInTokyo; OahuBreeze; yonif; risk; Steel Wolf; nuconvert; MizSterious; ...

Ping!


3 posted on 08/09/2004 7:19:09 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

China wants NK to get on the stick and quit making waves. The more NK messes up, the more money China stands to lose.


4 posted on 08/09/2004 7:22:32 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
If China invaded NK under the auspices of taking out the WMD and Nukes, Bush wouldn't have a leg to stand on to criticize the invasion.
5 posted on 08/09/2004 7:23:05 AM PDT by Rebelbase (Bush is Hell on liberals and terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
China has crossed the Yalu before.

You can bet that if they cross again, it will not be in S. Korea's or America's interest.

Despite all the manuevering and claims to the contrary, I still believe N. Korea is China's surrogate in the area and that all the other is a product of Sun Tzu philosophy...All warfare is deception.

6 posted on 08/09/2004 7:27:14 AM PDT by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase
Maybe there's a deal in the works?

China neutralizes NK and America allows China to absorb Taiwan like Hong Kong?

7 posted on 08/09/2004 7:36:15 AM PDT by CROSSHIGHWAYMAN (I don't believe anything a Democrat says. Bill Clinton set the standard!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: Jeff Head

You just nailed it. NK does nothing without the PRC's approval.


9 posted on 08/09/2004 7:50:58 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
"Some in S. Korea have begun to worry that Chinese will invade to oust Kim Jong-il and install a pro-Chinese regime in N. Korea while grabbing a chunk of N. Korean territory. We will see what the real Chinese intention is."

- If I was Bush, I'd take that deal. Get rid of the North's nuke threat, avoid casualties, give the Chinese the headache of an unpopular occupation and keep the South safe through the continued presence of US forces. Where's the downside?
10 posted on 08/09/2004 8:16:41 AM PDT by finnigan2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
PLA's border security unit must have been the one conducting the exercise

Border troops wouldn't have organic heavy bridging capability. This exercise had support from much higher up.

11 posted on 08/09/2004 8:22:52 AM PDT by LTCJ (God Save the Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: finnigan2

The downside is that the occupation would not be that unpopular. PRC communism (where you don't starve to death and have to resort to canibalism) in NK would delay the Reunification of Korea for decades. From the American viewpoint it is a pragmatic solution that we could live with. The South Koreans will be devastated but that is the price they must pay for their appeasement and dovish policies. The only people who lose out who don't deserve it are the Japanese.


12 posted on 08/09/2004 8:35:51 AM PDT by azcap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: finnigan2

Turning our backs on South Korea.. not to mention Taiwan and Japan would get figidity about the U.S. letting the Chinese grab land.

You want Japan to build some nukes? Let the Chinese take an aggressive move against anyone.


13 posted on 08/09/2004 8:36:36 AM PDT by Almondjoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Thanx


14 posted on 08/09/2004 8:41:45 AM PDT by nuconvert (Everyone has a photographic memory. Some don't have film.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

If it's preparation for anything in particular, it's preparation to respond to a U.S. move to destabilize or invade the DPRK. It's not a threat to the DPRK from the PRC.


15 posted on 08/09/2004 8:53:27 AM PDT by ableChair
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

A Chinese blitzkrieg into NK to 'prevent' a nuclear confrontation between the psychotic NK regime and the rest of the world would be in China's best interest economically and strategically. China has serious race issues with the thousands of North Korean refugees flooding into the Middle Kingdom and this act would assuage the xenophobic fears of the average Chinese. I don't see the US giving a crap about NK getting its' butt whooped at someone elses' expense. Frankly, it would likely speed up reunification of the Koreas as China would immediately open the border between the North and South as a potential trade route for China. Taiwan would be affected only so much as if China uses the invasion of NK to practice a blue-water amphibious operation into NK. Then we could assume the invasion of NK is a dress rehearsal for an invasion of Taiwan. Further, I don't see China invading Taiwan during the Bush administration but I see it as a huge threat with Kerry in the Oval Office. Kerry would almost certainly give the PRC carte blanc on such a thing.


16 posted on 08/09/2004 9:03:03 AM PDT by PeterFinn (Free Tibet...from Communist China!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase

"If China invaded NK under the auspices of taking out the WMD and Nukes, Bush wouldn't have a leg to stand on to criticize the invasion."

***

That depends entirely on what China's intentions are. To my knowledge, NK has not threatened China. They may threaten us because they know they can easily sway the opinions of the Soccer Mom Brigades and other "War Is Bad For Children and Other Growing Things" types. It's safe to say at the very least that there are no soccer moms in Red China.

Therefore China can't say with any credibility that NK is threatening them with terrorist attacks because China doesn't have the handicap of squishy or squeamish public opinion to prevent them from vaporizing NK and NK knows it.

Only the soccer-mommish types would believe that China would be subscribing to the Bush Doctrine.

The other motivations are:

1) NK is screwing up our trade agreements and relations in general with the U.S.
2) We need more land for our people.
3) Variation on #2 -- we want to annex South Korea too.


17 posted on 08/09/2004 10:00:07 AM PDT by Zhangliqun (War IS the answer -- when the alternative is even worse...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Zhangliqun

This is China's way of telling us to stay out of Taiwan.


18 posted on 08/09/2004 12:13:41 PM PDT by EQAndyBuzz ("John Kerry does not want to lead this country, he wants to be president.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia; Revel; lacylu; Letitring

ping


19 posted on 08/09/2004 12:34:25 PM PDT by nw_arizona_granny (You could do a general Google search for: jihad internet today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase

Correctomundo! [But few here have a clue ... I am glad you DO! Thanks! ]


20 posted on 08/09/2004 1:19:56 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Right makes right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson