Replies

I understand you accuse me of hating catholics all the time as an argumentation device. No parent that corrects their child loves them - you do realize that don't you. No spouse that disagrees with their partner loves them - nope - it's shear hatred. You say oj and she says grape juice - you are a bigot. See how easy that was. But it's just about your only device for going after me because in 6 years you guys haven't found anything else to aptly discredit me with.

You discredit yourself everytime you hit the "Post" button. And I do understand that correction is an act of love. Which makes your hissy fit about the Church labeling anathemas even more hysterical.

You apparently recognize when you string together non sequiturs and bring up unrelated acts of violence by nominal Catholics in South America to blame victims of Church bombings in Iraq on the Church's alleged "policies" that it is just "loving correction" from you.

But you throw a fit if the Church, in a calm and rational matter declares "this is a bad thing to believe."

Well, lets see, who's discrediting who each time he hits the post button - would that be you. I didn't blame attacks on Christians overseas by islamists on Rome. Didn't come anywhere near that. I asked if Rome had done anything to cause a retaliation by the islamists.

Most everything you've said is ad hominem. Why is it so difficult for you to simply address the original question without running us on a merry chase and attacking?