Yep. Go after Kerry's totally-unproductive 20 years in the Senate, especially his flip-flops on the Iraq War.
Vietnam is a loser.
reviewing the 20 years in the Senate will be the focus of attention at the convention in New York, during the debates, etc., etc..
Wrong! Swift vets should go after VietName and the Bush team should go after Kerry's 20 years. Boing after both IS a winning combo.
Vietnam is a loser."
Me thinks you think the 10% 'swing' voters are so intellectually astute that they'll be able to digest the discrepancies of his '20 year Senate vote history'. No way Jose --- Vietnam / war / lies / stories / and more lies --- is the way to go!
Swiftboat vets..."full speed ahead!"
Which is what the Bush/Cheney campaign has been and will continue to do.
Vietnam is a loser.
These SwiftVets are not politicians. They have a Vietnam experience that they say has been misrepresented and they want to have their say. It is not and should not be confused with the Bush political campaign, either by Kerry supporters or handwringing Bush supporters who worry too much.
There is nothing right about Kerry showing and telling a story of Vietnam that these men say is a lie and then telling these men "Too bad, you better shut the hell up. Kerry can say whatever he wants, including showing pictures of you to imply you all support him and you better not rock the boat and make everyone feel all uncomfortable by contradicting his highness".
That is wrong and doing wrong is what will backfire every time.