Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Steven W.
As was discussed on this thread the other day, not only was Kerry most likely not in Cambodia, his timeline is a bit off. He says he was being fired upon by the Khmer Rouge in 1968, yet the Khmer Rouge as it came to be known was not formed until 1970, and then it was a movement contained mostly in northwest Cambodia, near the Thai border.

It is nearly inconceiveable that any part of the future Khmer Rouge organization was carrying out militant operations in the far east or southeast of Cambodia, which is where Kerry would have been, supposing he was actually in Cambodia at all.

27 posted on 08/08/2004 5:24:19 PM PDT by tdadams (If there were no problems, politicians would have to invent them... wait, they already do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: tdadams

Great point about the Khmer Rouge's existence and location.

Even a Clintonian sociopath can't wiggle out of this (he said hopefully), and Kerry's no Clinton.


47 posted on 08/08/2004 5:31:06 PM PDT by litany_of_lies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson