[bin2baghdad]

NY Times outs a REAL undercover intelligence asset - not merely a desk-bound paper pusher like Valerie Pflame.

[I know this appeared yesterday, but my search didn't turn it up here.]

[Steven W.]

the real culprits are the sleazy Michael Moore-on types who claimed the terrorist alerts are all political and, for that matter, John Kerry, who not only witheld any real condemnation of his spokesman Howard Dean's comments earlier last week, has actually questioned "whether the war on terrorism is really a war at all"

[Reactionary]

Let's have an investigation to see which liberal scumbag leaked *this* information, shall we?

No? You mean the Beltway scumbags aren't interested?

[secretagent]

Security experts contacted by Reuters said they were shocked by the revelations that the source whose information led to the alert was identified within days, and that U.S. officials had confirmed his name.

If the US had stayed mum, the NY Times would have had no story.

Who in the Fed-Gov confirmed the guy's name?

[Mr. Buzzcut]

This news story is frustrating in its incompleteness ...

[Tacis]

This is why it is so important that no one on this secure siye mention ANYTHING about all the Reuters reporters in the middle-east who are on the Mossad payroll and report secretly a lot of what they don't actually print to Tel Aviv.

[ridesthemiles]

I've said it before--Bears Repeating-- "Loose lips sink ships". Just as workable today as 60 years ago.

[bayourod]

Maybe the leak was intentional to let Al Qadeans know that there are spies among them. Remember, a Muslim who changes religions is supposed to be killed. They may not have even thought that a member would sell out to the great satin.

Sowing the seeds of suspician.